DP11
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#DP11
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP11
Decision question
Once Engineer Intern A accepted employment under the 90-day licensure condition and subsequently failed the PE exam a third time — triggering State X's additional requirements — did his obligation to promptly disclose that failure to XYZ Consultants arise from a deontological faithful agent duty owed to his employer, from prudential self-interest in protecting the employment relationship, or from both, and does the grounding of that obligation affect its ethical force?
Focus
Engineer Intern A: Post-Hire Faithful Agent Notification Obligation vs. Prudential Self-Protection After Third PE Exam Failure
Option1
Promptly disclose the third PE exam failure and its State X regulatory consequences to XYZ Consultants as a faithful agent duty owed to the employer, framing the notification as fulfillment of a professional obligation to ensure the employer can make informed staffing and project decisions
Option2
Disclose the third PE exam failure to XYZ Consultants after first consulting with a professional advisor or attorney to assess the employment consequences, treating the disclosure as a strategic relational decision rather than an immediate professional duty
Option3
Disclose the third PE exam failure to XYZ Consultants while simultaneously presenting a concrete remediation plan — including a timeline for satisfying State X's additional requirements — framing the disclosure as a proactive faithful agent notification paired with a proposed path to fulfilling the employment condition
Role
Engineer Intern A
TTL
@prefix case130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case130:DP11 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP11" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP11" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Once Engineer Intern A accepted employment under the 90-day licensure condition and subsequently failed the PE exam a third time — triggering State X's additional requirements — did his obligation to promptly disclose that failure to XYZ Consultants arise from a deontological faithful agent duty owed to his employer, from prudential self-interest in protecting the employment relationship, or from both, and does the grounding of that obligation affect its ethical force?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer Intern A: Post-Hire Faithful Agent Notification Obligation vs. Prudential Self-Protection After Third PE Exam Failure" ;
proeth:option1 "Promptly disclose the third PE exam failure and its State X regulatory consequences to XYZ Consultants as a faithful agent duty owed to the employer, framing the notification as fulfillment of a professional obligation to ensure the employer can make informed staffing and project decisions" ;
proeth:option2 "Disclose the third PE exam failure to XYZ Consultants after first consulting with a professional advisor or attorney to assess the employment consequences, treating the disclosure as a strategic relational decision rather than an immediate professional duty" ;
proeth:option3 "Disclose the third PE exam failure to XYZ Consultants while simultaneously presenting a concrete remediation plan — including a timeline for satisfying State X's additional requirements — framing the disclosure as a proactive faithful agent notification paired with a proposed path to fulfilling the employment condition" ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer Intern A" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T10:01:18.541416"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 130 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-26T10:01:18.541416
Generated by
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction