DP10
Individual
0924aca0
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#DP10
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP10
Decision Question
Did Engineer Intern A have an affirmative ethical duty to volunteer his two prior PE exam failures at the interview with XYZ Consultants, given that the firm made PE licensure within 90 days an explicit condition of hire, even though he was never directly asked about his exam history?
Focus
Engineer Intern A: PE Exam Failure Non-Disclosure Materiality Assessment at Pre-Employment Interview
Option1
Remain silent about prior exam failures at the interview, relying on the employer's failure to ask as establishing that the information was not required, while affirmatively representing intent to sit for the exam imminently
Option2
Proactively disclose both prior PE exam failures at the interview as directly material to the employer's stated 90-day licensure condition, framing the disclosure as part of an honest account of one's qualification trajectory
Option3
Decline to volunteer prior exam failures at the interview but, upon accepting the offer, proactively disclose the two prior failures to the employer before the 90-day licensure clock begins running, treating acceptance as the point at which the faithful agent obligation to disclose material risk crystallizes
Role Label
Engineer Intern A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#DP10> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP10" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
0924aca0e4760355...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-26T10:01:18.541291
Generated By
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction