DP5

DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint

DP5

If the traditional irrigation system design is an ethical expression of engineering work, what must Cutting Edge Engineering do to complete the design ethically after Wasser's refusal — and is simple task reassignment sufficient, or must the firm integrate Wasser's objection into a proactive client disclosure and alternatives presentation?

Whether Cutting Edge Engineering's most ethically complete path to completing the irrigation design — following Wasser's refusal — is to simply reassign the task to a willing engineer, or whether the firm is obligated to integrate Wasser's documented sustainability objection into its client communication by presenting the Resort Development Client with the hydrogeological study's findings, the sustainability concerns raised, and a developed sustainable irrigation alternative alongside the traditional design, so that the client's decision to proceed is fully informed.

Reassign the irrigation sketching task to another engineer or complete it through Jaylani, and simultaneously present the Resort Development Client with the hydrogeological study's water table findings, Wasser's sustainability concerns, and a fully developed sustainable alternative irrigation design alongside the traditional design, documenting the client's informed decision to proceed

Reassign the irrigation sketching task to another engineer or complete it through Jaylani without separately presenting the hydrogeological study's findings or sustainable alternatives to the Resort Development Client, treating task completion as the full discharge of the firm's obligation

Decline to complete the irrigation design scope until the Resort Development Client has been presented with the hydrogeological study's findings and has had a meaningful opportunity to choose a sustainable alternative, conditioning further design work on that informed client decision

Client Loyalty Obligation On Cutting Edge Engineering