Standards Committee Role Disclosure Invoked By Engineer A
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#Standards_Committee_Role_Disclosure_Invoked_By_Engineer_A
Properties
Instance of
StandardsCommitteeRoleDisclosureinExpertWitnessEngagements
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#StandardsCommitteeRoleDisclosureinExpertWitnessEngagements
Applied to
Expert witness engagement in personal injury litigation involving pressure vessel explosion
Professional relationship between Engineer A (committee chair) and Engineer B (subcommittee member)
Balancing with
Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits
Loyalty to retaining client
Concrete expression
Engineer A, as chair of the boiler code standards and safety committee, is obligated to disclose to Attorney X both Engineer A's own committee chairmanship role and the fact that opposing expert Engineer B serves as a member of a technical subcommittee within that same committee, before proceeding with the forensic expert witness engagement
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Interpretation
In this context, the principle requires Engineer A to affirmatively surface the supervisory committee relationship with the opposing expert to retaining counsel, so that Attorney X can assess whether the relationship creates a conflict, an appearance of impropriety, or a strategic consideration that affects the engagement
Invoked by
Engineer A Standards Committee Chair Forensic Expert
Tension resolution
Disclosure to Attorney X is the mechanism that allows the conflict to be assessed and managed without requiring automatic recusal — the principle does not prohibit the engagement but requires full transparency about the professional relationship
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A learns that the forensic engineering expert for the plaintiff, Engineer B, is a member of one of the technical subcommittees within the boiler code standards and safety committee that Engineer A chairs
Text references
Engineer A learns that the forensic engineering expert for the plaintiff, Engineer B, is a member of one of the technical subcommittees within the boiler code standards and safety committee that Engineer A chairs
Engineer A, who chairs a boiler code standards and safety committee within an engineering society, has been requested by Attorney X, a defense attorney, to conduct an investigation and potentially serve as an expert witness on behalf of a boiler manufacturer in connection with a personal injury case involving a pressure vessel explosion
TTL
@prefix case129: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case129:Standards_Committee_Role_Disclosure_Invoked_By_Engineer_A a proeth:StandardsCommitteeRoleDisclosureinExpertWitnessEngagements,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Standards Committee Role Disclosure Invoked By Engineer A" ;
proeth:appliedto "Expert witness engagement in personal injury litigation involving pressure vessel explosion",
"Professional relationship between Engineer A (committee chair) and Engineer B (subcommittee member)" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits",
"Loyalty to retaining client" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A, as chair of the boiler code standards and safety committee, is obligated to disclose to Attorney X both Engineer A's own committee chairmanship role and the fact that opposing expert Engineer B serves as a member of a technical subcommittee within that same committee, before proceeding with the forensic expert witness engagement" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "129" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "129" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "In this context, the principle requires Engineer A to affirmatively surface the supervisory committee relationship with the opposing expert to retaining counsel, so that Attorney X can assess whether the relationship creates a conflict, an appearance of impropriety, or a strategic consideration that affects the engagement" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Standards Committee Chair Forensic Expert" ;
proeth:principleclass "Standards Committee Role Disclosure in Expert Witness Engagements" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A learns that the forensic engineering expert for the plaintiff, Engineer B, is a member of one of the technical subcommittees within the boiler code standards and safety committee that Engineer A chairs" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Disclosure to Attorney X is the mechanism that allows the conflict to be assessed and managed without requiring automatic recusal — the principle does not prohibit the engagement but requires full transparency about the professional relationship" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A learns that the forensic engineering expert for the plaintiff, Engineer B, is a member of one of the technical subcommittees within the boiler code standards and safety committee that Engineer A chairs",
"Engineer A, who chairs a boiler code standards and safety committee within an engineering society, has been requested by Attorney X, a defense attorney, to conduct an investigation and potentially serve as an expert witness on behalf of a boiler manufacturer in connection with a personal injury case involving a pressure vessel explosion" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 129 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:54:29.975532"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 129 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
129
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00
First case
129
Generated
2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00
Attributed to
Case 129 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:54:29.975532
Generated by
ProEthica Case 129 Extraction