Objectivity Invoked By Engineer A Forensic Investigation
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#Objectivity_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Forensic_Investigation
Properties
Instance of
Applied to
Expert witness opinion on boiler safety
Forensic investigation of pressure vessel explosion
Balancing with
Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits
Loyalty to retaining client
Concrete expression
Engineer A must conduct the forensic investigation of the pressure vessel explosion and render expert opinions based solely on technical evidence and professional judgment, without allowing the defense attorney's litigation interests, the manufacturer's commercial interests, or the committee supervisory relationship with opposing expert Engineer B to shape or distort the technical conclusions
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Interpretation
Objectivity in this context requires Engineer A to maintain complete independence from the retaining party's advocacy interests and to ensure that the committee supervisory relationship over Engineer B does not create either actual bias or the appearance of bias in the forensic analysis
Invoked by
Engineer A Standards Committee Chair Forensic Expert
Tension resolution
The engineer's objectivity obligation is not subordinated by the adversarial context of the litigation — Engineer A must render the same quality of objective technical opinion that would be rendered in a non-adversarial engineering investigation
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is a professional engineer with expertise in mechanical engineering who also serves as a forensic engineering expert
Text references
Engineer A is a professional engineer with expertise in mechanical engineering who also serves as a forensic engineering expert
Engineer A, who chairs a boiler code standards and safety committee within an engineering society, has been requested by Attorney X, a defense attorney, to conduct an investigation and potentially serve as an expert witness on behalf of a boiler manufacturer in connection with a personal injury case involving a pressure vessel explosion
TTL
@prefix case129: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case129:Objectivity_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Forensic_Investigation a proeth:Objectivity,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Objectivity Invoked By Engineer A Forensic Investigation" ;
proeth:appliedto "Expert witness opinion on boiler safety",
"Forensic investigation of pressure vessel explosion" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits",
"Loyalty to retaining client" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A must conduct the forensic investigation of the pressure vessel explosion and render expert opinions based solely on technical evidence and professional judgment, without allowing the defense attorney's litigation interests, the manufacturer's commercial interests, or the committee supervisory relationship with opposing expert Engineer B to shape or distort the technical conclusions" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "129" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "129" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "Objectivity in this context requires Engineer A to maintain complete independence from the retaining party's advocacy interests and to ensure that the committee supervisory relationship over Engineer B does not create either actual bias or the appearance of bias in the forensic analysis" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Standards Committee Chair Forensic Expert" ;
proeth:principleclass "Objectivity" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is a professional engineer with expertise in mechanical engineering who also serves as a forensic engineering expert" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The engineer's objectivity obligation is not subordinated by the adversarial context of the litigation — Engineer A must render the same quality of objective technical opinion that would be rendered in a non-adversarial engineering investigation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is a professional engineer with expertise in mechanical engineering who also serves as a forensic engineering expert",
"Engineer A, who chairs a boiler code standards and safety committee within an engineering society, has been requested by Attorney X, a defense attorney, to conduct an investigation and potentially serve as an expert witness on behalf of a boiler manufacturer in connection with a personal injury case involving a pressure vessel explosion" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 129 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:54:29.976176"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 129 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
129
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00
First case
129
Generated
2026-02-27T19:37:01.979262+00:00
Attributed to
Case 129 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:54:29.976176
Generated by
ProEthica Case 129 Extraction