Engineer D Situation 4 Jurisdiction-Specific Misconduct Threshold Assessment

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_D_Situation_4_Jurisdiction-Specific_Misconduct_Threshold_Assessment
Properties
Instance of
Jurisdiction-SpecificMisconductReportingThresholdComplianceObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Jurisdiction-SpecificMisconductReportingThresholdComplianceObligation
Case context
Situation 4: Engineer D applies a complaint to the State C board without demonstrating that State C's specific rules are violated by social-context card distribution of a State B card to a non-engineer.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.86
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer D
Obligation statement
Engineer D was obligated to evaluate Engineer A's Situation 4 conduct against State C's specific licensure rules — including whether social-context card distribution to a non-engineer constitutes a violation under State C statutes — before concluding that a reportable violation occurred.
Temporal scope
Before filing the complaint with the State C engineering licensure board
Source Evidence
Source text
Friend X shares the card with Engineer D, telling Engineer D that Engineer A recently gave Friend X the card while visiting State C.

Text references
Engineer D reports Engineer A to the State C engineering licensure board.
Friend X shares the card with Engineer D, telling Engineer D that Engineer A recently gave Friend X the card while visiting State C.
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case128:Engineer_D_Situation_4_Jurisdiction-Specific_Misconduct_Threshold_Assessment a proeth:Jurisdiction-SpecificMisconductReportingThresholdComplianceObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer D Situation 4 Jurisdiction-Specific Misconduct Threshold Assessment" ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case128:Sit4-ThirdPartyRedistribution-StateC ; proeth:casecontext "Situation 4: Engineer D applies a complaint to the State C board without demonstrating that State C's specific rules are violated by social-context card distribution of a State B card to a non-engineer." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.86" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case128:Jurisdiction-Specific_Misconduct_Reporting_Threshold_Invoked_By_Engineer_D ; proeth:discoveredincase "128" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer D" ; proeth:obligationclass "Jurisdiction-Specific Misconduct Reporting Threshold Compliance Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer D was obligated to evaluate Engineer A's Situation 4 conduct against State C's specific licensure rules — including whether social-context card distribution to a non-engineer constitutes a violation under State C statutes — before concluding that a reportable violation occurred." ; proeth:sourcetext "Friend X shares the card with Engineer D, telling Engineer D that Engineer A recently gave Friend X the card while visiting State C." ; proeth:temporalscope "Before filing the complaint with the State C engineering licensure board" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer D reports Engineer A to the State C engineering licensure board.", "Friend X shares the card with Engineer D, telling Engineer D that Engineer A recently gave Friend X the card while visiting State C." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.652156"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.652156
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction