Engineer A Situation 3 Non-Engineering Services Scope Maintenance State B

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_A_Situation_3_Non-Engineering_Services_Scope_Maintenance_State_B
Properties
Instance of
Non-EngineeringExpertServicesScopeMaintenanceObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Non-EngineeringExpertServicesScopeMaintenanceObligation
Case context
Situation 3: Engineer A performs non-engineering consulting services in State B while licensed only in State C. The business card accurately reflects this distinction, but the obligation to maintain the non-engineering character of State B services is ongoing.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to ensure that the consulting services he performs in State B — where he is not licensed as a PE — remain strictly non-engineering in character, consistent with the business card's representation that his PE licensure is limited to State C.
Temporal scope
Throughout the period of performing consulting services in State B
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A resides and performs non-engineering consulting services in State B.

Text references
Engineer A resides and performs non-engineering consulting services in State B.
Engineer A's business card notes that Engineer A's offices are in State B but that Engineer A is licensed in State C only.
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case128:Engineer_A_Situation_3_Non-Engineering_Services_Scope_Maintenance_State_B a proeth:Non-EngineeringExpertServicesScopeMaintenanceObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Situation 3 Non-Engineering Services Scope Maintenance State B" ; proeth-core:competesWith case128:Engineer_A_Situation_3_Office-Licensure_Differentiation_Business_Card ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case128:Sit3-TitleInvocation-StateB-NonEngineeringServices ; proeth:casecontext "Situation 3: Engineer A performs non-engineering consulting services in State B while licensed only in State C. The business card accurately reflects this distinction, but the obligation to maintain the non-engineering character of State B services is ongoing." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.87" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case128:Non-Engineering_Expert_Services_Permissibility_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Situation_3 ; proeth:discoveredincase "128" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Non-Engineering Expert Services Scope Maintenance Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to ensure that the consulting services he performs in State B — where he is not licensed as a PE — remain strictly non-engineering in character, consistent with the business card's representation that his PE licensure is limited to State C." ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A resides and performs non-engineering consulting services in State B." ; proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the period of performing consulting services in State B" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A resides and performs non-engineering consulting services in State B.", "Engineer A's business card notes that Engineer A's offices are in State B but that Engineer A is licensed in State C only." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.651519"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.651519
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction