Engineer A Situation 3 Non-Engineering Consulting Accurate Card Compliance

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_A_Situation_3_Non-Engineering_Consulting_Accurate_Card_Compliance
Properties
Instance of
BusinessCardPhysicalAddressInclusionLicensureClarityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BusinessCardPhysicalAddressInclusionLicensureClarityObligation
Case context
Engineer A has offices in State B but is licensed only in State C; performs non-engineering consulting in State B; distributes a card in State C accurately reflecting this distinction.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.9
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer A (Situation 3)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to ensure the business card accurately reflected the distinction between the state of office location (State B) and the state of licensure (State C); Engineer A satisfied this obligation by distributing a card in State C that accurately reflected offices in State B and licensure only in State C.
Temporal scope
At the time of distributing the business card in State C
Source Evidence
Source text
Situation (3) also describes an ethically acceptable practice

Text references
Situation (3) also describes an ethically acceptable practice
this Board does not view the act of handing out a business card by an individual who is not licensed in a state as unethical as long as there is no deception and the engineer is conforming with state registration laws and rules and practice
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case128:Engineer_A_Situation_3_Non-Engineering_Consulting_Accurate_Card_Compliance a proeth:BusinessCardPhysicalAddressInclusionLicensureClarityObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Situation 3 Non-Engineering Consulting Accurate Card Compliance" ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer A has offices in State B but is licensed only in State C; performs non-engineering consulting in State B; distributes a card in State C accurately reflecting this distinction." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Situation_3_Non-Engineering_Consulting_with_Accurate_Card_—_Ethical_Compliance> ; proeth:discoveredincase "128" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (Situation 3)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Business Card Physical Address Inclusion Licensure Clarity Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to ensure the business card accurately reflected the distinction between the state of office location (State B) and the state of licensure (State C); Engineer A satisfied this obligation by distributing a card in State C that accurately reflected offices in State B and licensure only in State C." ; proeth:sourcetext "Situation (3) also describes an ethically acceptable practice" ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time of distributing the business card in State C" ; proeth:textreferences "Situation (3) also describes an ethically acceptable practice", "this Board does not view the act of handing out a business card by an individual who is not licensed in a state as unethical as long as there is no deception and the engineer is conforming with state registration laws and rules and practice" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.661018"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.661018
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction