Engineer A Situation 2 Licensure State Identification Compliance
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_A_Situation_2_Licensure_State_Identification_Compliance
Properties
Instance of
BusinessCardPhysicalAddressInclusionLicensureClarityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BusinessCardPhysicalAddressInclusionLicensureClarityObligation
Case context
Engineer A distributes a business card at a business meeting in State E that identifies residence in State E and lists States B, C, and D as the states of licensure; Engineer A is not licensed in State E.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (Situation 2)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to include a physical address and to identify the states of licensure on the business card distributed in State E; Engineer A satisfied this obligation by listing a State E address and identifying States B, C, and D as the states of licensure.
Temporal scope
At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Sit2-Address Licensure Mismatch-State E
derivedFromPrinciple
Qualification Transparency Satisfied By Engineer A Situation 2 Business Card
Source Evidence
Source text
In Situation (2), Engineer A identifies his residence as State E, the state in which he is attending the business meeting, and also identifies the states in which he is licensed
Text references
Engineer A's actions are truthful and not deceptive
In Situation (2), Engineer A identifies his residence as State E, the state in which he is attending the business meeting, and also identifies the states in which he is licensed
The clear representation is that Engineer A is not licensed in State E even though his business address is there
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case128:Engineer_A_Situation_2_Licensure_State_Identification_Compliance a proeth:BusinessCardPhysicalAddressInclusionLicensureClarityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Situation 2 Licensure State Identification Compliance" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case128:Sit2-AddressLicensureMismatch-StateE ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A distributes a business card at a business meeting in State E that identifies residence in State E and lists States B, C, and D as the states of licensure; Engineer A is not licensed in State E." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case128:Qualification_Transparency_Satisfied_By_Engineer_A_Situation_2_Business_Card ;
proeth:discoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (Situation 2)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Business Card Physical Address Inclusion Licensure Clarity Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to include a physical address and to identify the states of licensure on the business card distributed in State E; Engineer A satisfied this obligation by listing a State E address and identifying States B, C, and D as the states of licensure." ;
proeth:sourcetext "In Situation (2), Engineer A identifies his residence as State E, the state in which he is attending the business meeting, and also identifies the states in which he is licensed" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's actions are truthful and not deceptive",
"In Situation (2), Engineer A identifies his residence as State E, the state in which he is attending the business meeting, and also identifies the states in which he is licensed",
"The clear representation is that Engineer A is not licensed in State E even though his business address is there" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.660776"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.660776
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction