Engineer A Situation 1 Truthful Advertising Obligation Violation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_A_Situation_1_Truthful_Advertising_Obligation_Violation
Properties
Instance of
TruthfulandNon-DeceptiveAdvertisingObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#TruthfulandNon-DeceptiveAdvertisingObligation
Case context
Engineer A's Situation 1 business card bears the PE designation without a physical address or identification of licensing states, distributed at a business meeting in State E where Engineer A is not licensed.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (Situation 1)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to ensure the business card distributed at the State E business meeting was truthful and not deceptive regarding licensure status; the omission of a physical address and states of licensure created an unacceptable appearance of deception, violating this obligation.
Temporal scope
At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Sit1-Business Card-No Address-No Licensure States
derivedFromPrinciple
Truthful Non-Deceptive Advertising Obligation Invoked in Business Card Context
Source Evidence
Source text
Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed, e.g., State E
Text references
Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed, e.g., State E
The business card in Situation (1) does not identify a physical address, and for this reason the scenario is not acceptable
a fundamental principle is that such advertising must be conducted in a manner that is truthful and not misleading or deceptive
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case128:Engineer_A_Situation_1_Truthful_Advertising_Obligation_Violation a proeth:TruthfulandNon-DeceptiveAdvertisingObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Situation 1 Truthful Advertising Obligation Violation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case128:Antitrust_Commercial_Speech_Tempering_of_Advertising_Ethics_Recognition ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case128:Sit1-BusinessCard-NoAddress-NoLicensureStates ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case128:Antitrust_Commercial_Speech_Tempering_of_Advertising_Ethics_Recognition ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's Situation 1 business card bears the PE designation without a physical address or identification of licensing states, distributed at a business meeting in State E where Engineer A is not licensed." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case128:Truthful_Non-Deceptive_Advertising_Obligation_Invoked_in_Business_Card_Context ;
proeth:discoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (Situation 1)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Truthful and Non-Deceptive Advertising Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to ensure the business card distributed at the State E business meeting was truthful and not deceptive regarding licensure status; the omission of a physical address and states of licensure created an unacceptable appearance of deception, violating this obligation." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed, e.g., State E" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting" ;
proeth:textreferences "Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed, e.g., State E",
"The business card in Situation (1) does not identify a physical address, and for this reason the scenario is not acceptable",
"a fundamental principle is that such advertising must be conducted in a manner that is truthful and not misleading or deceptive" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.662969"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T22:04:35.546107+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.662969
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction