Engineer A Situation 1 Mailing Address Omission Business Card

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_A_Situation_1_Mailing_Address_Omission_Business_Card
Properties
Instance of
Multi-StatePEBusinessCardMailingAddressInclusionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Multi-StatePEBusinessCardMailingAddressInclusionObligation
Case context
Situation 1: Engineer A's business card omits both the states of licensure and any mailing address, compounding the misleading impression of the card.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to include a mailing address on his business card when distributing a PE-designated card at a business meeting in State E, so that recipients could identify the geographic base of his practice.
Temporal scope
At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting
Source Evidence
Source text
The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed.

Text references
The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed.
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case128:Engineer_A_Situation_1_Mailing_Address_Omission_Business_Card a proeth:Multi-StatePEBusinessCardMailingAddressInclusionObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Situation 1 Mailing Address Omission Business Card" ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case128:Sit1-BusinessCard-NoAddress-NoLicensureStates ; proeth:casecontext "Situation 1: Engineer A's business card omits both the states of licensure and any mailing address, compounding the misleading impression of the card." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case128:Business_Card_Mailing_Address_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_Situation_1 ; proeth:discoveredincase "128" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Multi-State PE Business Card Mailing Address Inclusion Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to include a mailing address on his business card when distributing a PE-designated card at a business meeting in State E, so that recipients could identify the geographic base of his practice." ; proeth:sourcetext "The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed." ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting" ; proeth:textreferences "The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.650893"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.650893
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction