Engineer A Multi-Jurisdiction Business Card Presenter
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_A_Multi-Jurisdiction_Business_Card_Presenter
Definition
Engineer A presents business cards in multiple situations across states where licensure status varies: (1) without a physical address, (2) with a physical address in State E and explicit licensure states listed, (3) with a physical address in State D and licensure states listed while attending a meeting in State E, and (4) distributing cards at a social occasion in State C where not licensed.
Properties
Instance of
Multi-JurisdictionBusinessCardPresentingEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Multi-JurisdictionBusinessCardPresentingEngineer
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer in multiple states |
| situations_analyzed | ['Situation 1 - no physical address (not acceptable)', 'Situation 2 - physical address in State E with licensure states listed (acceptable)', 'Situation 3 - physical address in State D with licensure states listed (acceptable)', 'Situation 4 - social occasion in State C (acceptable)'] |
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | peer |
| target | Engineer D Improper Complaint Filer |
| type | subject_of_review |
| target | NSPE Board of Ethical Review |
Role category
provider_client
Relationships
adheresToPrinciple
Ethics Code Spirit and Letter Obligation in Advertising Context, Honesty in Professional Representations Invoked By Engineer A Business Card Content, Jurisdiction-Specific Ethics Compliance Invoked By Engineer A Multi-State Card Distribution, Licensure Integrity and Public Protection Invoked Across All Situations
Source Evidence
Source text
Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed
Text references
Engineer A's distribution of his business card during a social occasion was entirely proper
In Situation (2), Engineer A identifies his residence as State E, the state in which he is attending the business meeting, and also identifies the states in which he is licensed
Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case128:Engineer_A_Multi-Jurisdiction_Business_Card_Presenter a proeth:Multi-JurisdictionBusinessCardPresentingEngineer,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Multi-Jurisdiction Business Card Presenter" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case128:Ethics_Code_Spirit_and_Letter_Obligation_in_Advertising_Context,
case128:Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Business_Card_Content,
case128:Jurisdiction-Specific_Ethics_Compliance_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Multi-State_Card_Distribution,
case128:Licensure_Integrity_and_Public_Protection_Invoked_Across_All_Situations ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case128:Engineer_A_Multi-State_Advertising_State_Registration_Law_Conformance,
case128:Engineer_A_Situation_4_Social_Context_Non-Violation_Recognition,
case128:Engineers_and_Firms_Marketing_Material_Currency_Maintenance_Ongoing_Obligation ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer in multiple states', 'situations_analyzed': ['Situation 1 - no physical address (not acceptable)', 'Situation 2 - physical address in State E with licensure states listed (acceptable)', 'Situation 3 - physical address in State D with licensure states listed (acceptable)', 'Situation 4 - social occasion in State C (acceptable)']}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Engineer A presents business cards in multiple situations across states where licensure status varies: (1) without a physical address, (2) with a physical address in State E and explicit licensure states listed, (3) with a physical address in State D and licensure states listed while attending a meeting in State E, and (4) distributing cards at a social occasion in State C where not licensed." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T21:52:18.140411+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T21:52:18.140411+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer D Improper Complaint Filer'}",
"{'type': 'subject_of_review', 'target': 'NSPE Board of Ethical Review'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Multi-Jurisdiction Business Card Presenting Engineer" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's distribution of his business card during a social occasion was entirely proper",
"In Situation (2), Engineer A identifies his residence as State E, the state in which he is attending the business meeting, and also identifies the states in which he is licensed",
"Situation (1) presents a circumstance that could easily raise questions concerning Engineer A being perceived as a 'professional engineer' in a state where he/she is not licensed" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.638385"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T21:52:18.140411+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T21:52:18.140411+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.638385
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction