Post-Peer-Review-Procurement-Conflict-Standard-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#Post-Peer-Review-Procurement-Conflict-Standard-Instance
Properties
Instance of
Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard
Confidence
0.82
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review / professional consensus
Document title
Professional Norms on Conflicts Arising from Post-Review Procurement
Importance
medium
Used by
Engineer B and the franchiser when transitioning from review engagement to full design contract
Used in context
Addresses whether Engineer B's subsequent retention as the franchiser's full design engineer — following his review of Engineer A's pending design work — creates an ethical conflict of interest given insider knowledge gained during the review
Version
Current NSPE interpretation
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A's agreement with the franchiser expires and the franchiser retains Engineer B as its design engineer
Text references
Engineer A's agreement with the franchiser expires and the franchiser retains Engineer B as its design engineer
TTL
@prefix case126: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case126:Post-Peer-Review-Procurement-Conflict-Standard-Instance a proeth:Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Post-Peer-Review-Procurement-Conflict-Standard-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review / professional consensus" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional Norms on Conflicts Arising from Post-Review Procurement" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A's agreement with the franchiser expires and the franchiser retains Engineer B as its design engineer" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's agreement with the franchiser expires and the franchiser retains Engineer B as its design engineer" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer B and the franchiser when transitioning from review engagement to full design contract" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Addresses whether Engineer B's subsequent retention as the franchiser's full design engineer — following his review of Engineer A's pending design work — creates an ethical conflict of interest given insider knowledge gained during the review" ;
proeth:version "Current NSPE interpretation" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 126 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:31:55.138364"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 126 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
126
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00
First case
126
Generated
2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00
Attributed to
Case 126 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:31:55.138364
Generated by
ProEthica Case 126 Extraction