Peer Review Notification Obligation Standard (Section III.8.a)
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#Peer_Review_Notification_Obligation_Standard_Section_III.8.a
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewWithoutNotificationStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewWithoutNotificationStandard
Confidence
0.9
Created by
NSPE (codified in Section III.8.a, interpreted by BER)
Document title
Professional Standard: Engineer Notification Obligation When Reviewing Another Engineer's Work
Importance
high
Used by
Board of Ethical Review in evaluating Engineer B's timing of disclosure
Used in context
Establishes the professional norm that a reviewing engineer must notify the original engineer within a reasonable time; applied to assess whether Engineer B's one-week delay was a violation
Version
Interpreted in this case
Source Evidence
Source text
We interpret Section III.8.a. to require disclosure within a reasonable period of time following the establishment of the relationship and the review.
Text references
We find nothing to suggest that Engineer A's rights were prejudiced by the short delay. In view of all of the facts and circumstances involved in this case, we believe the one week delay is not unreasonable and consistent with Section III.8.a.
We interpret Section III.8.a. to require disclosure within a reasonable period of time following the establishment of the relationship and the review.
TTL
@prefix case126: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case126:Peer_Review_Notification_Obligation_Standard_Section_III.8.a a proeth:PeerReviewWithoutNotificationStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Peer Review Notification Obligation Standard (Section III.8.a)" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE (codified in Section III.8.a, interpreted by BER)" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional Standard: Engineer Notification Obligation When Reviewing Another Engineer's Work" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:11:05.176661+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:11:05.176661+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Peer Review Without Notification Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "We interpret Section III.8.a. to require disclosure within a reasonable period of time following the establishment of the relationship and the review." ;
proeth:textreferences "We find nothing to suggest that Engineer A's rights were prejudiced by the short delay. In view of all of the facts and circumstances involved in this case, we believe the one week delay is not unreasonable and consistent with Section III.8.a.",
"We interpret Section III.8.a. to require disclosure within a reasonable period of time following the establishment of the relationship and the review." ;
proeth:usedby "Board of Ethical Review in evaluating Engineer B's timing of disclosure" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Establishes the professional norm that a reviewing engineer must notify the original engineer within a reasonable time; applied to assess whether Engineer B's one-week delay was a violation" ;
proeth:version "Interpreted in this case" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 126 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:31:55.140757"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 126 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
126
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:11:05.176661+00:00
First case
126
Generated
2026-03-01T10:11:05.176661+00:00
Attributed to
Case 126 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:31:55.140757
Generated by
ProEthica Case 126 Extraction