Engineer B Peer Review Notification and Consent Fulfillment
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Notification_and_Consent_Fulfillment
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewNotificationandConsentObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewNotificationandConsentObligation
Case context
Engineer B was retained to review Engineer A's pending design work while Engineer A's contract was still active; the franchiser instructed Engineer B not to disclose the engagement; Engineer B notified Engineer A following the review.
Compliance status
partial
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer B
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A that Engineer A's work was being subjected to an independent peer review before or upon commencing that review, recognizing that Engineer A's professional dignity and right to know that their active work was under evaluation required notification regardless of the franchiser's confidentiality instruction.
Temporal scope
Prior to or immediately upon commencing the peer review
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Client Covert Review Instruction to Engineer B, Notification Duty vs. Faithful Agent Duty Conflict, Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Absent — Engineer A Design Review
derivedFromPrinciple
Professional Dignity of Incumbent Engineer Underlying Peer Notification Purpose
Source Evidence
Source text
franchiser specifically tells Engineer B not to disclose to Engineer A, Engineer B's relationship with franchiser
Text references
Engineer B reviews the design information the following week and following his review, notifies Engineer A of his relationship with franchiser and the preliminary results of his review
franchiser specifically tells Engineer B not to disclose to Engineer A, Engineer B's relationship with franchiser
TTL
@prefix case126: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case126:Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Notification_and_Consent_Fulfillment a proeth:PeerReviewNotificationandConsentObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Peer Review Notification and Consent Fulfillment" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case126:Engineer_B_Client_Confidentiality_Instruction_Faithful_Agent_Compliance_BER_Case ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case126:Client_Covert_Review_Instruction_to_Engineer_B,
case126:Notification_Duty_vs._Faithful_Agent_Duty_Conflict,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Agreement_Absent_—_Engineer_A_Design_Review> ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B was retained to review Engineer A's pending design work while Engineer A's contract was still active; the franchiser instructed Engineer B not to disclose the engagement; Engineer B notified Engineer A following the review." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "partial" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case126:Professional_Dignity_of_Incumbent_Engineer_Underlying_Peer_Notification_Purpose ;
proeth:discoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:15:07.500687+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:15:07.500687+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Peer Review Notification and Consent Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A that Engineer A's work was being subjected to an independent peer review before or upon commencing that review, recognizing that Engineer A's professional dignity and right to know that their active work was under evaluation required notification regardless of the franchiser's confidentiality instruction." ;
proeth:sourcetext "franchiser specifically tells Engineer B not to disclose to Engineer A, Engineer B's relationship with franchiser" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Prior to or immediately upon commencing the peer review" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B reviews the design information the following week and following his review, notifies Engineer A of his relationship with franchiser and the preliminary results of his review",
"franchiser specifically tells Engineer B not to disclose to Engineer A, Engineer B's relationship with franchiser" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 126 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:31:55.146062"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 126 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
126
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:15:07.500687+00:00
First case
126
Generated
2026-03-01T10:15:07.500687+00:00
Attributed to
Case 126 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:31:55.146062
Generated by
ProEthica Case 126 Extraction