Engineer A Original Design Engineer Subject to Peer Review
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#Engineer_A_Original_Design_Engineer_Subject_to_Peer_Review
Definition
The incumbent engineer whose prior work is being reviewed by Engineer B; not initially notified of Engineer B's engagement per client instruction; ultimately notified by Engineer B after approximately one week; the Board found Engineer A's rights were not prejudiced by the short delay.
Properties
Instance of
OriginalDesignEngineerSubjecttoPeerReview
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#OriginalDesignEngineerSubjecttoPeerReview
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer |
| right | To receive notification of peer review under NSPE III.8.a |
| purpose_of_notification | To submit comments or explanations for technical decisions, enabling reviewing engineer to have fuller understanding of original design |
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | client |
| target | Client Confidentiality-Instructing Engineering Services Client |
| type | peer |
| target | Engineer B Faithful Agent Peer-Notification-Conflicted Reviewing Engineer |
| type | work_reviewed_by |
| target | Engineer B Faithful Agent Peer-Notification-Conflicted Reviewing Engineer |
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
Section III.8.a. admonishes engineers against reviewing the work of another engineer for the same client except with expressed knowledge of the engineer
Text references
Section III.8.a. admonishes engineers against reviewing the work of another engineer for the same client except with expressed knowledge of the engineer
We find nothing to suggest that Engineer A's rights were prejudiced by the short delay
the purpose of Section 12(a) (now Section III.8.a.) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer an opportunity to submit...comments or explanations
TTL
@prefix case126: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case126:Engineer_A_Original_Design_Engineer_Subject_to_Peer_Review a proeth:OriginalDesignEngineerSubjecttoPeerReview,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Original Design Engineer Subject to Peer Review" ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'right': 'To receive notification of peer review under NSPE III.8.a', 'purpose_of_notification': 'To submit comments or explanations for technical decisions, enabling reviewing engineer to have fuller understanding of original design'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "The incumbent engineer whose prior work is being reviewed by Engineer B; not initially notified of Engineer B's engagement per client instruction; ultimately notified by Engineer B after approximately one week; the Board found Engineer A's rights were not prejudiced by the short delay." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:11:02.816793+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:11:02.816793+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'client', 'target': 'Client Confidentiality-Instructing Engineering Services Client'}",
"{'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer B Faithful Agent Peer-Notification-Conflicted Reviewing Engineer'}",
"{'type': 'work_reviewed_by', 'target': 'Engineer B Faithful Agent Peer-Notification-Conflicted Reviewing Engineer'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Original Design Engineer Subject to Peer Review" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Section III.8.a. admonishes engineers against reviewing the work of another engineer for the same client except with expressed knowledge of the engineer" ;
proeth:textreferences "Section III.8.a. admonishes engineers against reviewing the work of another engineer for the same client except with expressed knowledge of the engineer",
"We find nothing to suggest that Engineer A's rights were prejudiced by the short delay",
"the purpose of Section 12(a) (now Section III.8.a.) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer an opportunity to submit...comments or explanations" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 126 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:31:55.141121"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 126 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
126
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:11:02.816793+00:00
First case
126
Generated
2026-03-01T10:11:02.816793+00:00
Attributed to
Case 126 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:31:55.141121
Generated by
ProEthica Case 126 Extraction