DP9
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#DP9
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP9
Decision question
Should Engineer B have limited disclosure to Engineer A to the existence of the new engagement relationship, or was Engineer B also permitted — or obligated — to share the preliminary review results at the time of notification?
Focus
Engineer B's Scope of Disclosure to Engineer A: Whether Engineer B's disclosure to Engineer A should have been limited to the existence of the new engagement relationship, or whether sharing the preliminary review results was also permissible or required under the peer review notification obligation.
Option1
Limit notification to Engineer A to the fact of the new engagement relationship with the franchiser and the fact that a peer review was conducted, without sharing any preliminary findings or analytical conclusions, thereby honoring the minimum required by the peer notification obligation while minimizing the compounding breach of the faithful agent duty.
Option2
Notify Engineer A of both the new engagement relationship and the preliminary review findings, reasoning that a notification limited to the existence of the engagement is insufficient to give Engineer A a meaningful opportunity to respond to technical concerns identified during the review, and that the peer notification obligation's substantive purpose requires disclosure of what was found.
Option3
Notify Engineer A of the engagement relationship immediately, then seek the franchiser's consent before sharing any preliminary review findings with Engineer A, preserving Engineer A's right to know of the review while honoring the faithful agent duty with respect to work-product confidentiality until the client either grants permission or the review process reaches a stage where disclosure is formally required.
Role
Engineer
TTL
@prefix case126: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case126:DP9 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP9" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP9" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer B have limited disclosure to Engineer A to the existence of the new engagement relationship, or was Engineer B also permitted — or obligated — to share the preliminary review results at the time of notification?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer B's Scope of Disclosure to Engineer A: Whether Engineer B's disclosure to Engineer A should have been limited to the existence of the new engagement relationship, or whether sharing the preliminary review results was also permissible or required under the peer review notification obligation." ;
proeth:option1 "Limit notification to Engineer A to the fact of the new engagement relationship with the franchiser and the fact that a peer review was conducted, without sharing any preliminary findings or analytical conclusions, thereby honoring the minimum required by the peer notification obligation while minimizing the compounding breach of the faithful agent duty." ;
proeth:option2 "Notify Engineer A of both the new engagement relationship and the preliminary review findings, reasoning that a notification limited to the existence of the engagement is insufficient to give Engineer A a meaningful opportunity to respond to technical concerns identified during the review, and that the peer notification obligation's substantive purpose requires disclosure of what was found." ;
proeth:option3 "Notify Engineer A of the engagement relationship immediately, then seek the franchiser's consent before sharing any preliminary review findings with Engineer A, preserving Engineer A's right to know of the review while honoring the faithful agent duty with respect to work-product confidentiality until the client either grants permission or the review process reaches a stage where disclosure is formally required." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:52:09.304260"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 126 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-03-01T10:52:09.304260
Generated by
ProEthica Case 126 Extraction