DP5

@prefix case126: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case126:DP5 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP5" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP5" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer B limit notification to Engineer A to the existence of the new engagement relationship, or also disclose the preliminary results of the peer review when notifying Engineer A?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer B: Scope of Permissible Disclosure — Engagement Relationship Only vs. Preliminary Review Results" ; proeth:option1 "Limit notification to Engineer A to the fact of the new engagement relationship and the existence of the peer review, without transmitting any preliminary analytical conclusions or design-specific findings derived from the confidential client engagement." ; proeth:option2 "Notify Engineer A of both the new engagement relationship and the preliminary results of the peer review, on the ground that Engineer A cannot meaningfully exercise the right to respond to technical concerns without knowing the substance of those concerns." ; proeth:option3 "Before notifying Engineer A of anything, return to the franchiser and seek explicit authorization for the minimum disclosure necessary to satisfy the peer review notification obligation, thereby preserving the faithful agent relationship while attempting to create a compliant notification pathway." ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:52:09.306954"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 126 Extraction" .