BER-Case-Precedent-Peer-Review-Notification
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#BER-Case-Precedent-Peer-Review-Notification
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.83
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Cases on Peer Review Notification and Engineer Replacement
Importance
medium
Used by
Ethics analysis of Engineer B's conduct
Used in context
Provides analogical precedential reasoning for Engineer B's situation — specifically prior BER rulings on whether an engineer may review another engineer's work without notification, and whether accepting a client while the incumbent's contract is still active is ethically permissible
Version
Prior BER decisions relevant to review-without-notification scenarios
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B reviews the design information the following week and following his review, notifies Engineer A of his relationship with franchiser
Text references
Engineer B reviews the design information the following week and following his review, notifies Engineer A of his relationship with franchiser
TTL
@prefix case126: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/126#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case126:BER-Case-Precedent-Peer-Review-Notification a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER-Case-Precedent-Peer-Review-Notification" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.83" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Cases on Peer Review Notification and Engineer Replacement" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "126" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B reviews the design information the following week and following his review, notifies Engineer A of his relationship with franchiser" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B reviews the design information the following week and following his review, notifies Engineer A of his relationship with franchiser" ;
proeth:usedby "Ethics analysis of Engineer B's conduct" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Provides analogical precedential reasoning for Engineer B's situation — specifically prior BER rulings on whether an engineer may review another engineer's work without notification, and whether accepting a client while the incumbent's contract is still active is ethically permissible" ;
proeth:version "Prior BER decisions relevant to review-without-notification scenarios" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 126 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:31:55.138549"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 126 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
126
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00
First case
126
Generated
2026-03-01T10:09:52.574434+00:00
Attributed to
Case 126 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:31:55.138549
Generated by
ProEthica Case 126 Extraction