Highway Route Technical Controversy
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#Highway_Route_Technical_Controversy
Properties
Instance of
PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState
Active period
From the state highway department's proposal of route X through Engineer A's conclusion favoring route Y and Engineer B's society appearance
Affected parties
Citizens group
Engineer A
Engineer B
General public
Professional society chapter
State highway department
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Subject
Competing technical assessments of route X vs. route Y for the state highway
Terminated by
Final routing decision by highway authority
Triggering event
State highway department proposes route X; Engineer A concludes route Y is superior
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
A state highway department proposes routing a new state highway through a city via route X
Text references
A state highway department proposes routing a new state highway through a city via route X
Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route
TTL
@prefix case125: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case125:Highway_Route_Technical_Controversy a proeth:PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Highway Route Technical Controversy" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the state highway department's proposal of route X through Engineer A's conclusion favoring route Y and Engineer B's society appearance" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Citizens group",
"Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"General public",
"Professional society chapter",
"State highway department" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T10:45:57.241631+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T10:45:57.241631+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "A state highway department proposes routing a new state highway through a city via route X" ;
proeth:stateclass "Public Controversy Engineering Decision State" ;
proeth:subject "Competing technical assessments of route X vs. route Y for the state highway" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Final routing decision by highway authority" ;
proeth:textreferences "A state highway department proposes routing a new state highway through a city via route X",
"Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "State highway department proposes route X; Engineer A concludes route Y is superior" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 125 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T11:07:26.779880"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 125 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
125
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T10:45:57.241631+00:00
First case
125
Generated
2026-03-02T10:45:57.241631+00:00
Attributed to
Case 125 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:07:26.779880
Generated by
ProEthica Case 125 Extraction