Highway Route Technical Controversy
Individual
32f44b1e
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#Highway_Route_Technical_Controversy
Properties
Parent
PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState
Activeperiod
From the state highway department's proposal of route X through Engineer A's conclusion favoring route Y and Engineer B's society appearance
Affectedparties
Citizens group
Engineer A
Engineer B
General public
Professional society chapter
State highway department
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Stateclass
Public Controversy Engineering Decision State
Subject
Competing technical assessments of route X vs. route Y for the state highway
Terminatedby
Final routing decision by highway authority
Triggeringevent
State highway department proposes route X; Engineer A concludes route Y is superior
Urgencylevel
medium
Source Evidence
Source Text
A state highway department proposes routing a new state highway through a city via route X
Text References
A state highway department proposes routing a new state highway through a city via route X
Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_125: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#Highway_Route_Technical_Controversy> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Highway Route Technical Controversy" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
32f44b1ebc952f01...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
125
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T10:45:57.241631+00:00
First Case
125
Generated
2026-03-02T10:45:57.241631+00:00
Attributed To
Case 125 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:07:26.779880
Generated By
ProEthica Case 125 Extraction