Engineers A and B Compensated Civic Engineering Participation Permissibility
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#Engineers_A_and_B_Compensated_Civic_Engineering_Participation_Permissibility
Properties
Instance of
CivicEngineeringParticipationNon-ConfinementtoFreeServicesObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CivicEngineeringParticipationNon-ConfinementtoFreeServicesObligation
Case context
Engineers A and B were paid by the local citizens group for their route study and opinion; the ethics board evaluated whether compensated civic advocacy was permissible under the code.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.89
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineers A and B
Obligation statement
Engineers A and B were entitled to recognize — and the ethics board was obligated to recognize — that their compensated retention by the citizens group to study highway route alternatives and advocate for route Y constituted ethically permissible civic engineering participation, not confined to free community services.
Temporal scope
Throughout the engagement
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Civic Service as Professional Duty Invoked for Highway Route Advocacy
Source Evidence
Source text
Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes.
Text references
And we further assume for our purposes that the group of local citizens is covered by the reference to 'private interests' and is paying the firm for its study and opinion.
Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes.
Participation in engineering considerations of such public issues is to be encouraged as a direct means of fulfilling the objective of providing 'constructive service in civic affairs. . . .' We do not interpret that aspect of professional responsibility as being confined to free community services.
TTL
@prefix case125: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case125:Engineers_A_and_B_Compensated_Civic_Engineering_Participation_Permissibility a proeth:CivicEngineeringParticipationNon-ConfinementtoFreeServicesObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineers A and B Compensated Civic Engineering Participation Permissibility" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case125:Engineers_A_and_B_Professional_Affiliation_Non-Exploitation_Threshold_Assessment ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case125:Engineers_A_and_B_Professional_Affiliation_Non-Exploitation_Threshold_Assessment ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineers A and B were paid by the local citizens group for their route study and opinion; the ethics board evaluated whether compensated civic advocacy was permissible under the code." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case125:Civic_Service_as_Professional_Duty_Invoked_for_Highway_Route_Advocacy ;
proeth:discoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T10:58:52.039862+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T10:58:52.039862+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineers A and B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Civic Engineering Participation Non-Confinement to Free Services Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineers A and B were entitled to recognize — and the ethics board was obligated to recognize — that their compensated retention by the citizens group to study highway route alternatives and advocate for route Y constituted ethically permissible civic engineering participation, not confined to free community services." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the engagement" ;
proeth:textreferences "And we further assume for our purposes that the group of local citizens is covered by the reference to 'private interests' and is paying the firm for its study and opinion.",
"Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes.",
"Participation in engineering considerations of such public issues is to be encouraged as a direct means of fulfilling the objective of providing 'constructive service in civic affairs. . . .' We do not interpret that aspect of professional responsibility as being confined to free community services." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 125 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T11:07:26.790471"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 125 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
125
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T10:58:52.039862+00:00
First case
125
Generated
2026-03-02T10:58:52.039862+00:00
Attributed to
Case 125 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:07:26.790471
Generated by
ProEthica Case 125 Extraction