Engineers A and B Civic Advocacy Engagement

S · State Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#Engineers_A_and_B_Civic_Advocacy_Engagement
Properties
Instance of
CivicEngineeringAdvocacyPermissibilityState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CivicEngineeringAdvocacyPermissibilityState
Active period
From the inception of the retainer through the conclusion of the public controversy over route selection
Affected parties
Citizens group client
Engineer A
Engineer B
General public
Local chapter
Confidence
0.84
Importance
medium
Subject
Engineers A and B's retention by the local citizens group to study alternative routes and advocate for route Y
Terminated by
Resolution of the public route selection controversy
Triggering event
Local citizens group retaining Engineers A and B's firm to study alternative routes and provide professional opinion on the preferred route
Urgency level
low
Source Evidence
Source text
Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes.

Text references
Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes.
Participation in engineering considerations of such public issues is to be encouraged as a direct means of fulfilling the objective of providing 'constructive service in civic affairs. . . .'
We do not interpret that aspect of professional responsibility as being confined to free community services.
TTL
@prefix case125: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case125:Engineers_A_and_B_Civic_Advocacy_Engagement a proeth:CivicEngineeringAdvocacyPermissibilityState, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineers A and B Civic Advocacy Engagement" ; proeth:activeperiod "From the inception of the retainer through the conclusion of the public controversy over route selection" ; proeth:affectedparties "Citizens group client", "Engineer A", "Engineer B", "General public", "Local chapter" ; proeth:conceptCategory "State" ; proeth:confidence "0.84" ; proeth:discoveredincase "125" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T10:47:39.927325+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "125" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T10:47:39.927325+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:sourcetext "Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes." ; proeth:stateclass "Civic Engineering Advocacy Permissibility State" ; proeth:subject "Engineers A and B's retention by the local citizens group to study alternative routes and advocate for route Y" ; proeth:terminatedby "Resolution of the public route selection controversy" ; proeth:textreferences "Certainly it was entirely proper for Engineers A and B to be retained by the local citizens for the stated purpose and to offer their professional judgment and opinion as to the merits of the alternative routes.", "Participation in engineering considerations of such public issues is to be encouraged as a direct means of fulfilling the objective of providing 'constructive service in civic affairs. . . .'", "We do not interpret that aspect of professional responsibility as being confined to free community services." ; proeth:triggeringevent "Local citizens group retaining Engineers A and B's firm to study alternative routes and provide professional opinion on the preferred route" ; proeth:urgencylevel "low" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 125 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T11:07:26.782007"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 125 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
125
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T10:47:39.927325+00:00
First case
125
Generated
2026-03-02T10:47:39.927325+00:00
Attributed to
Case 125 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:07:26.782007
Generated by
ProEthica Case 125 Extraction