Competing Public Goods in Route Selection
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/124#Competing_Public_Goods_in_Route_Selection
Properties
Instance of
CompetingPublicGoodsTensionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetingPublicGoodsTensionState
Active period
Throughout the route selection deliberation process
Affected parties
City official
City residents
Consulting engineer
General public
State highway department
Confidence
0.82
Importance
medium
Subject
Route selection decision involving competing public interests: highway efficiency, water supply protection, and recreational area development
Terminated by
Final route selection decision by highway department
Triggering event
City official's public criticism that route B would endanger the city's water supply and harm lake recreation area development
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
An official of a city located close to the proposed route publicly criticized the proposed route 'B' because he felt it would endanger the city's water supply and be a detriment to the development of a lake as a proposed recreation area
Text references
An official of a city located close to the proposed route publicly criticized the proposed route 'B' because he felt it would endanger the city's water supply and be a detriment to the development of a lake as a proposed recreation area
TTL
@prefix case124: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/124#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case124:Competing_Public_Goods_in_Route_Selection a proeth:CompetingPublicGoodsTensionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Competing Public Goods in Route Selection" ;
proeth:activeperiod "Throughout the route selection deliberation process" ;
proeth:affectedparties "City official",
"City residents",
"Consulting engineer",
"General public",
"State highway department" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "124" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:15:40.969902+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "124" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:15:40.969902+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:sourcetext "An official of a city located close to the proposed route publicly criticized the proposed route 'B' because he felt it would endanger the city's water supply and be a detriment to the development of a lake as a proposed recreation area" ;
proeth:stateclass "Competing Public Goods Tension State" ;
proeth:subject "Route selection decision involving competing public interests: highway efficiency, water supply protection, and recreational area development" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Final route selection decision by highway department" ;
proeth:textreferences "An official of a city located close to the proposed route publicly criticized the proposed route 'B' because he felt it would endanger the city's water supply and be a detriment to the development of a lake as a proposed recreation area" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "City official's public criticism that route B would endanger the city's water supply and harm lake recreation area development" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 124 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:41:57.134477"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 124 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
124
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:15:40.969902+00:00
First case
124
Generated
2026-03-02T15:15:40.969902+00:00
Attributed to
Case 124 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:41:57.134477
Generated by
ProEthica Case 124 Extraction