DP7
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/123#DP7
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP7
Decision question
When Engineer A identifies that the shortest route requires displacing a 100-year-old historic farmhouse whose owner refuses to sell, what form of advisory does Engineer A owe the state client — and when does that obligation arise?
Focus
Engineer A: Faithful Agent Disclosure and Harm Minimization Advisory to State Client
Option1
Disclose the farmhouse conflict to the state immediately upon identifying the route impact, visit the owner to gather material information, and present the owner's refusal and the full proportionality of harm to the state as part of the initial route advisory — before any route recommendation is finalized
Option2
Complete the route analysis and present the shortest route recommendation to the state first, then disclose the owner's opposition and eminent domain implications as a follow-on advisory once the state has confirmed its preference for the shorter route — treating owner engagement as a subsequent implementation-phase task rather than a route-selection input
Option3
Disclose the farmhouse conflict to the state upon identifying the impact, but limit the advisory to technical route geometry and eminent domain availability without conducting a proactive owner visit or providing a proportionality assessment of travel time savings versus cultural harm — on the grounds that owner negotiation and value-weighting are outside the contracted engineering scope
Role
Engineer
TTL
@prefix case123: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/123#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case123:DP7 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP7" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP7" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "When Engineer A identifies that the shortest route requires displacing a 100-year-old historic farmhouse whose owner refuses to sell, what form of advisory does Engineer A owe the state client — and when does that obligation arise?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer A: Faithful Agent Disclosure and Harm Minimization Advisory to State Client" ;
proeth:option1 "Disclose the farmhouse conflict to the state immediately upon identifying the route impact, visit the owner to gather material information, and present the owner's refusal and the full proportionality of harm to the state as part of the initial route advisory — before any route recommendation is finalized" ;
proeth:option2 "Complete the route analysis and present the shortest route recommendation to the state first, then disclose the owner's opposition and eminent domain implications as a follow-on advisory once the state has confirmed its preference for the shorter route — treating owner engagement as a subsequent implementation-phase task rather than a route-selection input" ;
proeth:option3 "Disclose the farmhouse conflict to the state upon identifying the impact, but limit the advisory to technical route geometry and eminent domain availability without conducting a proactive owner visit or providing a proportionality assessment of travel time savings versus cultural harm — on the grounds that owner negotiation and value-weighting are outside the contracted engineering scope" ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T00:30:07.371459"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 123 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-28T00:30:07.371459
Generated by
ProEthica Case 123 Extraction