Qualitative_Risk_Assessment_Competence_Gaps
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#Qualitative_Risk_Assessment_Competence_Gaps
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.78
Created by
Professional engineering practice norms
Document title
Risk Assessment Framework for Evaluating Competence Gaps in Engineering Project Acceptance
Importance
medium
Used by
Engineer B (should have applied prior to accepting project); County A in evaluating qualifications
Used in context
Provides a structured methodology for assessing the likelihood and magnitude of harm when an engineer accepts a project outside their area of expertise, applicable to evaluating Engineer B's decision to accept rural roadway design work
Version
Professional methodology
Source Evidence
Source text
A significant number of field revisions were necessary and estimated quantities of work had been miscalculated, resulting in excessive time and effort for the County to resolve.
Text references
A significant number of field revisions were necessary and estimated quantities of work had been miscalculated, resulting in excessive time and effort for the County to resolve.
Engineer B did admit that the problems encountered were outside the firm's understanding of proper design. If understood by Engineer B, the issues could have been avoided.
TTL
@prefix case12: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case12:Qualitative_Risk_Assessment_Competence_Gaps a proeth:QualitativeRiskAssessment,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Qualitative_Risk_Assessment_Competence_Gaps" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.78" ;
proeth:createdby "Professional engineering practice norms" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "12" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Risk Assessment Framework for Evaluating Competence Gaps in Engineering Project Acceptance" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T19:46:49.376835+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "12" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T19:46:49.376835+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Qualitative Risk Assessment" ;
proeth:sourcetext "A significant number of field revisions were necessary and estimated quantities of work had been miscalculated, resulting in excessive time and effort for the County to resolve." ;
proeth:textreferences "A significant number of field revisions were necessary and estimated quantities of work had been miscalculated, resulting in excessive time and effort for the County to resolve.",
"Engineer B did admit that the problems encountered were outside the firm's understanding of proper design. If understood by Engineer B, the issues could have been avoided." ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer B (should have applied prior to accepting project); County A in evaluating qualifications" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Provides a structured methodology for assessing the likelihood and magnitude of harm when an engineer accepts a project outside their area of expertise, applicable to evaluating Engineer B's decision to accept rural roadway design work" ;
proeth:version "Professional methodology" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 12 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T20:03:54.179845"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 12 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
12
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-24T19:46:49.376835+00:00
First case
12
Generated
2026-02-24T19:46:49.376835+00:00
Attributed to
Case 12 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T20:03:54.179845
Generated by
ProEthica Case 12 Extraction