DP6

Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#DP6
Properties
Instance of
DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint
Decision Point Id
DP6
Decision question
Should Engineer B lobby the County Commission and assert adequate competence in rural roadway design when the firm's established expertise is limited to water and wastewater engineering and the firm faces economic pressure?
Focus
Engineer B's decision to lobby the County Commission and assert competence in rural roadway design despite lacking domain expertise, in response to a public advertisement during a business downturn
Option1
Lobby the County Commission and assert adequate competence in rural roadway design to secure the contract
Option2
Decline to pursue the rural roadway contract and refer County A to a firm with demonstrated highway design competence
Option3
Respond to the advertisement while honestly disclosing the firm's lack of rural roadway experience and proposing a qualified subconsultant arrangement as a condition of award
Role
Engineer B Rural Roadway Design Engineer
TTL
@prefix case12: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case12:DP6 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP6" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP6" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer B lobby the County Commission and assert adequate competence in rural roadway design when the firm's established expertise is limited to water and wastewater engineering and the firm faces economic pressure?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer B's decision to lobby the County Commission and assert competence in rural roadway design despite lacking domain expertise, in response to a public advertisement during a business downturn" ; proeth:option1 "Lobby the County Commission and assert adequate competence in rural roadway design to secure the contract" ; proeth:option2 "Decline to pursue the rural roadway contract and refer County A to a firm with demonstrated highway design competence" ; proeth:option3 "Respond to the advertisement while honestly disclosing the firm's lack of rural roadway experience and proposing a qualified subconsultant arrangement as a condition of award" ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer B Rural Roadway Design Engineer" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T20:17:29.714745"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 12 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 23:35
Generated
2026-02-24T20:17:29.714745
Generated by
ProEthica Case 12 Extraction