DP1
Individual
4f5cdd34
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#DP1
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP1
Decision Question
Should Engineer B have accepted the rural roadway design contract by asserting competence and lobbying the County Commission, given the firm's lack of demonstrated experience in rural highway design and the economic pressure to retain staff?
Focus
Engineer B's decision to respond to County A's advertisement, lobby the County Commission, and provide affirmative assurances of competence in rural roadway design — a domain outside the firm's established water and wastewater expertise — in order to secure the contract during a business downturn.
Option1
Decline to respond to the advertisement, disclose the firm's lack of rural roadway design experience to County A, and refer the County to a firm with demonstrated highway design competence
Option2
Respond to the advertisement, lobby the County Commission, and provide affirmative assurances of adequate performance in rural roadway design to secure the contract
Role Label
Engineer B
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_12: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#DP1> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP1" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
4f5cdd3481db56ac...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T20:17:29.714339
Generated By
ProEthica Case 12 Extraction