BER Case 98-8

Rs · Resource Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#BER_Case_98-8
Properties
Instance of
BERCasePrecedent
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BERCasePrecedent
Confidence
0.97
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 98-8
Importance
high
Used by
Board of Ethical Review for analogical reasoning about Engineer B's situation
Used in context
Referenced as directly analogous precedent: a civil engineer lacking competence in arms storage certification acted unethically by certifying work outside their area of expertise, paralleling Engineer B's lack of competence in roadway design
Version
1998
Source Evidence
Source text
In BER Case 98-8, a professional engineer in civil engineering was asked to certify certain arms storage rooms and racks for the Army. This engineer had no significant training or knowledge in that area, although the engineer was considered a qualified engineer.

Text references
In BER Case 98-8, a professional engineer in civil engineering was asked to certify certain arms storage rooms and racks for the Army. This engineer had no significant training or knowledge in that area, although the engineer was considered a qualified engineer.
That case is analogous to the present case.
The Board concluded that, because the engineer lacked competence in the specific area, it would not be ethical for the engineer to certify the arms storage rooms and arms storage racks.
TTL
@prefix case12: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/12#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case12:BER_Case_98-8 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "BER Case 98-8" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ; proeth:confidence "0.97" ; proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ; proeth:discoveredincase "12" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 98-8" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T19:47:31.126909+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "12" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T19:47:31.126909+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ; proeth:sourcetext "In BER Case 98-8, a professional engineer in civil engineering was asked to certify certain arms storage rooms and racks for the Army. This engineer had no significant training or knowledge in that area, although the engineer was considered a qualified engineer." ; proeth:textreferences "In BER Case 98-8, a professional engineer in civil engineering was asked to certify certain arms storage rooms and racks for the Army. This engineer had no significant training or knowledge in that area, although the engineer was considered a qualified engineer.", "That case is analogous to the present case.", "The Board concluded that, because the engineer lacked competence in the specific area, it would not be ethical for the engineer to certify the arms storage rooms and arms storage racks." ; proeth:usedby "Board of Ethical Review for analogical reasoning about Engineer B's situation" ; proeth:usedincontext "Referenced as directly analogous precedent: a civil engineer lacking competence in arms storage certification acted unethically by certifying work outside their area of expertise, paralleling Engineer B's lack of competence in roadway design" ; proeth:version "1998" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 12 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T20:03:54.182787"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 12 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 23:35
Discovered in case
12
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-24T19:47:31.126909+00:00
First case
12
Generated
2026-02-24T19:47:31.126909+00:00
Attributed to
Case 12 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T20:03:54.182787
Generated by
ProEthica Case 12 Extraction