Engineering-Fee-Adequacy-Standard
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/118#Engineering-Fee-Adequacy-Standard
Properties
Instance of
EngineeringFeeAdequacyStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineeringFeeAdequacyStandard
Confidence
0.82
Created by
NSPE and professional engineering community
Document title
Professional Norms on Adequate Engineering Fee Proposals
Importance
high
Used by
Firms B and C (protest); ethics review board
Used in context
Implicitly invoked by Firms B and C in arguing that Firm A's $50,000 proposal is so far below realistic costs as to foreseeably produce inadequate design and public safety risk; also relevant to evaluating whether Firm A acted ethically in submitting such a proposal
Source Evidence
Source text
the proposal of Firm A was so out of line with realistic costs for proper engineering performance for the project that the result would most likely be an inadequate design, with higher construction and maintenance costs over the life of the facility, and the possibility that the design could be unsafe and jeopardize the public health
Text references
the proposal of Firm A was so out of line with realistic costs for proper engineering performance for the project that the result would most likely be an inadequate design, with higher construction and maintenance costs over the life of the facility, and the possibility that the design could be unsafe and jeopardize the public health
TTL
@prefix case118: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/118#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case118:Engineering-Fee-Adequacy-Standard a proeth:EngineeringFeeAdequacyStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineering-Fee-Adequacy-Standard" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE and professional engineering community" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "118" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional Norms on Adequate Engineering Fee Proposals" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T20:58:46.844805+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "118" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T20:58:46.844805+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineering Fee Adequacy Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the proposal of Firm A was so out of line with realistic costs for proper engineering performance for the project that the result would most likely be an inadequate design, with higher construction and maintenance costs over the life of the facility, and the possibility that the design could be unsafe and jeopardize the public health" ;
proeth:textreferences "the proposal of Firm A was so out of line with realistic costs for proper engineering performance for the project that the result would most likely be an inadequate design, with higher construction and maintenance costs over the life of the facility, and the possibility that the design could be unsafe and jeopardize the public health" ;
proeth:usedby "Firms B and C (protest); ethics review board" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Implicitly invoked by Firms B and C in arguing that Firm A's $50,000 proposal is so far below realistic costs as to foreseeably produce inadequate design and public safety risk; also relevant to evaluating whether Firm A acted ethically in submitting such a proposal" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 118 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T21:27:08.564663"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 118 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
118
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T20:58:46.844805+00:00
First case
118
Generated
2026-03-01T20:58:46.844805+00:00
Attributed to
Case 118 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T21:27:08.564663
Generated by
ProEthica Case 118 Extraction