Engineer A Anonymous Complaint Filing State
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/116#Engineer_A_Anonymous_Complaint_Filing_State
Properties
Instance of
AnonymousReportingAdequacyState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AnonymousReportingAdequacyState
Active period
From Engineer A's decision to report through submission of the anonymous complaint; secondary ethical question persists regarding adequacy of anonymous versus signed reporting
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
State Engineering Licensure Board
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's decision to file an anonymous rather than signed complaint with the licensure board
Terminated by
Resolution of whether anonymous reporting satisfies the professional reporting obligation, or subsequent signed complaint if required
Triggering event
Engineer A submits an anonymous complaint to the state engineering licensure board identifying Engineer B and the circumstances surrounding the alleged violation
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A submits an anonymous complaint to the state engineering licensure board identifying Engineer B and the circumstances surrounding the alleged violation of the state board's rules of professional conduct
Text references
Engineer A submits an anonymous complaint to the state engineering licensure board identifying Engineer B and the circumstances surrounding the alleged violation of the state board's rules of professional conduct
TTL
@prefix case116: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/116#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case116:Engineer_A_Anonymous_Complaint_Filing_State a proeth:AnonymousReportingAdequacyState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Anonymous Complaint Filing State" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's decision to report through submission of the anonymous complaint; secondary ethical question persists regarding adequacy of anonymous versus signed reporting" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"State Engineering Licensure Board" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "116" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T23:35:59.656823+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "116" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T23:35:59.656823+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A submits an anonymous complaint to the state engineering licensure board identifying Engineer B and the circumstances surrounding the alleged violation of the state board's rules of professional conduct" ;
proeth:stateclass "Anonymous Reporting Adequacy State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's decision to file an anonymous rather than signed complaint with the licensure board" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Resolution of whether anonymous reporting satisfies the professional reporting obligation, or subsequent signed complaint if required" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A submits an anonymous complaint to the state engineering licensure board identifying Engineer B and the circumstances surrounding the alleged violation of the state board's rules of professional conduct" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A submits an anonymous complaint to the state engineering licensure board identifying Engineer B and the circumstances surrounding the alleged violation" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 116 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:53:17.772448"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 116 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
116
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T23:35:59.656823+00:00
First case
116
Generated
2026-02-28T23:35:59.656823+00:00
Attributed to
Case 116 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:53:17.772448
Generated by
ProEthica Case 116 Extraction