DP1
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/116#DP1
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP1
Decision question
Is Engineer A ethically obligated to report Engineer B's apparent serious violation to the state licensing board, and does the absence of a personal or competitive relationship with Engineer B affect that obligation?
Focus
Engineer A, a licensed professional engineer, has observed what he believes is a serious violation of the state board's rules of professional conduct by Engineer B — an engineer with whom he has no competitive relationship and no personal acquaintance. Engineer A must decide whether to report this apparent violation to the state engineering licensure board or remain silent, recognizing that engineering is a self-policing profession and that the duty to report is not discretionary.
Option1
File a complaint with the state engineering licensure board regarding Engineer B's apparent serious violation of professional conduct rules, acting on the foundational self-policing duty that applies to every licensed engineer regardless of personal or competitive relationship with the alleged violator.
Option2
Decline to report the violation on the grounds that Engineer A has no personal acquaintance with Engineer B and therefore no standing or sufficient basis to initiate a formal complaint, treating the reporting duty as contingent on personal relationship.
Option3
Attempt to contact Engineer B directly to discuss the apparent violation before filing any formal complaint with the licensing board, applying the collegial pre-reporting engagement norm regardless of the seriousness of the alleged violation.
Role
Engineer A — Disinterested Observing Licensed Professional Engineer
TTL
@prefix case116: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/116#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case116:DP1 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP1" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP1" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Is Engineer A ethically obligated to report Engineer B's apparent serious violation to the state licensing board, and does the absence of a personal or competitive relationship with Engineer B affect that obligation?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer A, a licensed professional engineer, has observed what he believes is a serious violation of the state board's rules of professional conduct by Engineer B — an engineer with whom he has no competitive relationship and no personal acquaintance. Engineer A must decide whether to report this apparent violation to the state engineering licensure board or remain silent, recognizing that engineering is a self-policing profession and that the duty to report is not discretionary." ;
proeth:option1 "File a complaint with the state engineering licensure board regarding Engineer B's apparent serious violation of professional conduct rules, acting on the foundational self-policing duty that applies to every licensed engineer regardless of personal or competitive relationship with the alleged violator." ;
proeth:option2 "Decline to report the violation on the grounds that Engineer A has no personal acquaintance with Engineer B and therefore no standing or sufficient basis to initiate a formal complaint, treating the reporting duty as contingent on personal relationship." ;
proeth:option3 "Attempt to contact Engineer B directly to discuss the apparent violation before filing any formal complaint with the licensing board, applying the collegial pre-reporting engagement norm regardless of the seriousness of the alleged violation." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A — Disinterested Observing Licensed Professional Engineer" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T00:03:38.418506"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 116 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-03-01T00:03:38.418506
Generated by
ProEthica Case 116 Extraction