State Power Commission PE Competing Public Goods Balanced Advisory
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#State_Power_Commission_PE_Competing_Public_Goods_Balanced_Advisory
Properties
Instance of
CompetingPublicGoodsBalancedAdvisoryDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetingPublicGoodsBalancedAdvisoryDisclosureObligation
Case context
Legislative hearing on bills involving water supply, flood control, and electric power production; the choice between low dams and one high dam involves trade-offs across multiple public goods.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.84
Importance
medium
Obligated party
State Power Commission PE (Legislative Witness)
Obligation statement
The state power commission PE was obligated to acknowledge and address the competing public goods at stake — water supply, flood control, and electric power production — in the legislative testimony, presenting the trade-offs between the low-dams and high-dam approaches completely and objectively so that the legislature could make an informed policy decision.
Temporal scope
During legislative testimony
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Competing Public Goods Balancing — Water Supply Flood Control Power Production
Source Evidence
Source text
A state legislature has pending various bills involving water supply, flood control and production of electric power
Text references
A state legislature has pending various bills involving water supply, flood control and production of electric power
engineering studies by him and his professional colleagues indicate the most efficient solution from an engineering standpoint is a series of low dams
TTL
@prefix case114: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case114:State_Power_Commission_PE_Competing_Public_Goods_Balanced_Advisory a proeth:CompetingPublicGoodsBalancedAdvisoryDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "State Power Commission PE Competing Public Goods Balanced Advisory" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case114:State_Power_Commission_PE_Legislative_Testimony_Objectivity ;
proeth:casecontext "Legislative hearing on bills involving water supply, flood control, and electric power production; the choice between low dams and one high dam involves trade-offs across multiple public goods." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.84" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Competing_Public_Goods_Balancing_—_Water_Supply_Flood_Control_Power_Production> ;
proeth:discoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "State Power Commission PE (Legislative Witness)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Competing Public Goods Balanced Advisory Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "The state power commission PE was obligated to acknowledge and address the competing public goods at stake — water supply, flood control, and electric power production — in the legislative testimony, presenting the trade-offs between the low-dams and high-dam approaches completely and objectively so that the legislature could make an informed policy decision." ;
proeth:sourcetext "A state legislature has pending various bills involving water supply, flood control and production of electric power" ;
proeth:temporalscope "During legislative testimony" ;
proeth:textreferences "A state legislature has pending various bills involving water supply, flood control and production of electric power",
"engineering studies by him and his professional colleagues indicate the most efficient solution from an engineering standpoint is a series of low dams" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 114 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:38:37.738578"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 114 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
114
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00
First case
114
Generated
2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00
Attributed to
Case 114 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:38:37.738578
Generated by
ProEthica Case 114 Extraction