State Power Commission PE — Honest Conviction Advocacy Prerequisite
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#State_Power_Commission_PE_—_Honest_Conviction_Advocacy_Prerequisite
Properties
Instance of
LegislativeHearingEngineeringAdvocateRoleHonestConvictionPrerequisiteObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#LegislativeHearingEngineeringAdvocateRoleHonestConvictionPrerequisiteObligation
Case context
State Power Commission PE served as an advocate for the state power commission's preferred engineering solution (series of low dams) before the state legislative committee.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Obligated party
State Power Commission PE Legislative Witness
Obligation statement
The State Power Commission PE, in advocating before the state legislative committee for a series of low dams, was obligated to ensure that this advocacy position was grounded in honest conviction based on adequate professional knowledge and analysis, not merely in the client's preferred outcome.
Temporal scope
During legislative committee testimony
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
State Power Commission Engineer Legislative Testimony
derivedFromPrinciple
Good Faith Public Welfare Sincerity — State Power Commission PE Testimony
Source Evidence
Source text
Rule 10 refers to the engineer being an 'advocate' of a position, again recognizing that contrary conclusions are to be expected.
Text references
Canons 5 and 7 refer to expression of 'opinion,' confirming the idea that the engineer is called upon for the expression of his judgment, not the mere recital of known engineering data.
Rule 10 refers to the engineer being an 'advocate' of a position, again recognizing that contrary conclusions are to be expected.
TTL
@prefix case114: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#State_Power_Commission_PE_—_Honest_Conviction_Advocacy_Prerequisite> a proeth:LegislativeHearingEngineeringAdvocateRoleHonestConvictionPrerequisiteObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "State Power Commission PE — Honest Conviction Advocacy Prerequisite" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case114:State_Power_Commission_Engineer_Legislative_Testimony ;
proeth:casecontext "State Power Commission PE served as an advocate for the state power commission's preferred engineering solution (series of low dams) before the state legislative committee." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Good_Faith_Public_Welfare_Sincerity_—_State_Power_Commission_PE_Testimony> ;
proeth:discoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "State Power Commission PE Legislative Witness" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Legislative Hearing Engineering Advocate Role Honest Conviction Prerequisite Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "The State Power Commission PE, in advocating before the state legislative committee for a series of low dams, was obligated to ensure that this advocacy position was grounded in honest conviction based on adequate professional knowledge and analysis, not merely in the client's preferred outcome." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Rule 10 refers to the engineer being an 'advocate' of a position, again recognizing that contrary conclusions are to be expected." ;
proeth:temporalscope "During legislative committee testimony" ;
proeth:textreferences "Canons 5 and 7 refer to expression of 'opinion,' confirming the idea that the engineer is called upon for the expression of his judgment, not the mere recital of known engineering data.",
"Rule 10 refers to the engineer being an 'advocate' of a position, again recognizing that contrary conclusions are to be expected." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 114 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:38:37.748130"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 114 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
114
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00
First case
114
Generated
2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00
Attributed to
Case 114 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:38:37.748130
Generated by
ProEthica Case 114 Extraction