Private Power Company PE Good Faith Sincerity Sufficiency
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_Good_Faith_Sincerity_Sufficiency
Properties
Instance of
GoodFaithSinceritySufficiencyforCivicAdvocacyEvaluationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#GoodFaithSinceritySufficiencyforCivicAdvocacyEvaluationObligation
Case context
Private power company PE testifies before legislative committee that engineering analysis supports one high dam as a more effective and less expensive solution for water supply, flood control, and electric power production.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.89
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Ethics adjudicators reviewing the private power company PE's testimony
Obligation statement
Ethics adjudicators reviewing the private power company PE's legislative testimony must recognize that it is sufficient to establish that the PE sincerely believed the one-high-dam solution best served the public interest; the PE need not be proven technically correct, and correctness of the engineering position is not germane to the ethical evaluation.
Temporal scope
At any point of ethics review following the legislative testimony
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Good Faith Public Welfare Sincerity — Private Power Company PE Testimony
Source Evidence
Source text
his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam
Text references
his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam
TTL
@prefix case114: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Good_Faith_Sincerity_Sufficiency a proeth:GoodFaithSinceritySufficiencyforCivicAdvocacyEvaluationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Private Power Company PE Good Faith Sincerity Sufficiency" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Testimony_Objectivity ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Testimony_Objectivity ;
proeth:casecontext "Private power company PE testifies before legislative committee that engineering analysis supports one high dam as a more effective and less expensive solution for water supply, flood control, and electric power production." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Good_Faith_Public_Welfare_Sincerity_—_Private_Power_Company_PE_Testimony> ;
proeth:discoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Ethics adjudicators reviewing the private power company PE's testimony" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Good Faith Sincerity Sufficiency for Civic Advocacy Evaluation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Ethics adjudicators reviewing the private power company PE's legislative testimony must recognize that it is sufficient to establish that the PE sincerely believed the one-high-dam solution best served the public interest; the PE need not be proven technically correct, and correctness of the engineering position is not germane to the ethical evaluation." ;
proeth:sourcetext "his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At any point of ethics review following the legislative testimony" ;
proeth:textreferences "his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 114 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:38:37.738297"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 114 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
114
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00
First case
114
Generated
2026-03-02T15:22:08.323408+00:00
Attributed to
Case 114 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:38:37.738297
Generated by
ProEthica Case 114 Extraction