Mutual Inter-Engineer Technical Criticism at Legislative Hearing
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Mutual_Inter-Engineer_Technical_Criticism_at_Legislative_Hearing
Properties
Instance of
ProfessionallyPermissibleInter-EngineerPublicCriticismState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProfessionallyPermissibleInter-EngineerPublicCriticismState
Active period
During the legislative committee hearings, concurrent with testimony submission
Affected parties
Engineer representing private power company
Engineer representing state power commission
State legislature and committee
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Subject
Both engineers openly criticizing each other's engineering analysis and findings before the legislative committee
Terminated by
Conclusion of legislative hearings
Triggering event
Submission of competing engineering analyses with contradictory conclusions by each engineer
Urgency level
low
Source Evidence
Source text
Each engineering witness submits voluminous engineering data in support of his position, and freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other
Text references
Each engineering witness submits voluminous engineering data in support of his position, and freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other
TTL
@prefix case114: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case114:Mutual_Inter-Engineer_Technical_Criticism_at_Legislative_Hearing a proeth:ProfessionallyPermissibleInter-EngineerPublicCriticismState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Mutual Inter-Engineer Technical Criticism at Legislative Hearing" ;
proeth:activeperiod "During the legislative committee hearings, concurrent with testimony submission" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer representing private power company",
"Engineer representing state power commission",
"State legislature and committee" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:15:42.311661+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:15:42.311661+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Each engineering witness submits voluminous engineering data in support of his position, and freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other" ;
proeth:stateclass "Professionally Permissible Inter-Engineer Public Criticism State" ;
proeth:subject "Both engineers openly criticizing each other's engineering analysis and findings before the legislative committee" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Conclusion of legislative hearings" ;
proeth:textreferences "Each engineering witness submits voluminous engineering data in support of his position, and freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Submission of competing engineering analyses with contradictory conclusions by each engineer" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "low" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 114 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:38:37.731086"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 114 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
114
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:15:42.311661+00:00
First case
114
Generated
2026-03-02T15:15:42.311661+00:00
Attributed to
Case 114 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:38:37.731086
Generated by
ProEthica Case 114 Extraction