BER_Legislative_Testimony_Case_Precedent
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#BER_Legislative_Testimony_Case_Precedent
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.9
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case on Engineer Legislative Testimony and Professional Criticism
Importance
high
Used by
Future engineers and ethics reviewers facing analogous situations
Used in context
This case itself constitutes a BER case precedent establishing norms for engineers testifying before legislative bodies with competing technical analyses and engaging in professional criticism of each other's work
Version
N/A
Source Evidence
Source text
A professional engineer representing the state power commission testifies that engineering studies by him and his professional colleagues indicate the most efficient solution from an engineering standpoint is a series of low dams
Text references
A professional engineer representing the state power commission testifies that engineering studies by him and his professional colleagues indicate the most efficient solution from an engineering standpoint is a series of low dams
Another professional engineer, representing a private power company, testifies that his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution
freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other
TTL
@prefix case114: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case114:BER_Legislative_Testimony_Case_Precedent a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER_Legislative_Testimony_Case_Precedent" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case on Engineer Legislative Testimony and Professional Criticism" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:15:11.810675+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:15:11.810675+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "A professional engineer representing the state power commission testifies that engineering studies by him and his professional colleagues indicate the most efficient solution from an engineering standpoint is a series of low dams" ;
proeth:textreferences "A professional engineer representing the state power commission testifies that engineering studies by him and his professional colleagues indicate the most efficient solution from an engineering standpoint is a series of low dams",
"Another professional engineer, representing a private power company, testifies that his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution",
"freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other" ;
proeth:usedby "Future engineers and ethics reviewers facing analogous situations" ;
proeth:usedincontext "This case itself constitutes a BER case precedent establishing norms for engineers testifying before legislative bodies with competing technical analyses and engaging in professional criticism of each other's work" ;
proeth:version "N/A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 114 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:38:37.728272"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 114 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
114
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:15:11.810675+00:00
First case
114
Generated
2026-03-02T15:15:11.810675+00:00
Attributed to
Case 114 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:38:37.728272
Generated by
ProEthica Case 114 Extraction