Legitimate Inter-Engineer Public Disagreement - Engineer C vs Engineers A and B
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/113#Legitimate_Inter-Engineer_Public_Disagreement_-_Engineer_C_vs_Engineers_A_and_B
Properties
Instance of
LegitimateInter-EngineerPublicDisagreementState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#LegitimateInter-EngineerPublicDisagreementState
Active period
From Engineer C's first public contention, persisting through the unresolved controversy
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Engineer C
Town Council
Town residents
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer C's public technical and ethical challenge to the design decisions of Engineers A and B
Terminated by
Not terminated within the case facts
Triggering event
Engineer C publicly contending that the higher-level design concept is environmentally unsound and questioning whether Engineers A and B should have agreed to the higher intensity use
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer C, a resident of the town, publicly contends that the higher level design concept would be environmentally unsound
Text references
Engineer C has publicly questioned whether Engineers A and B should have agreed to the higher intensity use of the site
Engineer C, a resident of the town, publicly contends that the higher level design concept would be environmentally unsound
TTL
@prefix case113: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/113#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case113:Legitimate_Inter-Engineer_Public_Disagreement_-_Engineer_C_vs_Engineers_A_and_B a proeth:LegitimateInter-EngineerPublicDisagreementState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Legitimate Inter-Engineer Public Disagreement - Engineer C vs Engineers A and B" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer C's first public contention, persisting through the unresolved controversy" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Engineer C",
"Town Council",
"Town residents" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "113" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:12:39.921562+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "113" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:12:39.921562+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer C, a resident of the town, publicly contends that the higher level design concept would be environmentally unsound" ;
proeth:stateclass "Legitimate Inter-Engineer Public Disagreement State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer C's public technical and ethical challenge to the design decisions of Engineers A and B" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not terminated within the case facts" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C has publicly questioned whether Engineers A and B should have agreed to the higher intensity use of the site",
"Engineer C, a resident of the town, publicly contends that the higher level design concept would be environmentally unsound" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer C publicly contending that the higher-level design concept is environmentally unsound and questioning whether Engineers A and B should have agreed to the higher intensity use" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 113 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:37:07.044025"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 113 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
113
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:12:39.921562+00:00
First case
113
Generated
2026-03-01T22:12:39.921562+00:00
Attributed to
Case 113 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:37:07.044025
Generated by
ProEthica Case 113 Extraction