Expanded Landfill Public Controversy Engineering Decision
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/113#Expanded_Landfill_Public_Controversy_Engineering_Decision
Properties
Instance of
PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState
Active period
From Engineer C's public criticism through the ethics board's analysis
Affected parties
Engineer C
Engineers A and B
General public
Town council
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Engineers A and B's expanded landfill design facing public and peer opposition
Terminated by
Resolution by appropriate public authority after due consideration
Triggering event
Engineer C publicly raising concerns about the expanded landfill design, creating public controversy around Engineers A and B's technical decision
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
That there are conflicting public views between engineers in this case should be of no concern
Text references
That there are conflicting public views between engineers in this case should be of no concern
There may...be honest differences of opinion among equally qualified engineers on the interpretation of the known physical facts
these decisions in the public arena are subject to open public debate and resolution by appropriate public authority
TTL
@prefix case113: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/113#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case113:Expanded_Landfill_Public_Controversy_Engineering_Decision a proeth:PublicControversyEngineeringDecisionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Expanded Landfill Public Controversy Engineering Decision" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer C's public criticism through the ethics board's analysis" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer C",
"Engineers A and B",
"General public",
"Town council" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "113" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:14:28.527785+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "113" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:14:28.527785+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "That there are conflicting public views between engineers in this case should be of no concern" ;
proeth:stateclass "Public Controversy Engineering Decision State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineers A and B's expanded landfill design facing public and peer opposition" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Resolution by appropriate public authority after due consideration" ;
proeth:textreferences "That there are conflicting public views between engineers in this case should be of no concern",
"There may...be honest differences of opinion among equally qualified engineers on the interpretation of the known physical facts",
"these decisions in the public arena are subject to open public debate and resolution by appropriate public authority" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer C publicly raising concerns about the expanded landfill design, creating public controversy around Engineers A and B's technical decision" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 113 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:37:07.044857"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 113 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
113
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:14:28.527785+00:00
First case
113
Generated
2026-03-01T22:14:28.527785+00:00
Attributed to
Case 113 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:37:07.044857
Generated by
ProEthica Case 113 Extraction