DP6

@prefix case112: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/112#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case112:DP6 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP6" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP6" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Does Engineer A's current command of the technical facts satisfy the Fact-Based Disclosure Obligation sufficiently to support immediate escalation to state and federal authorities, or must Engineer A undertake additional factual preparation before reporting — and could delay in escalation itself constitute an ethical violation?" ; proeth:focus "Whether the Fact-Based Disclosure Obligation — requiring Engineer A to command all relevant technical facts before reporting — conflicts with the Escalation Obligation requiring timely action after the council vote, and whether Engineer A's current technical knowledge already meets the threshold for credible and truthful reporting to state and federal authorities." ; proeth:option1 "Escalate immediately to state and federal authorities using the technical knowledge currently in hand — identifying the specific standards violated, the state law prerequisite unmet, and the council's override — while explicitly noting in the report that additional technical documentation will be supplemented as it becomes available" ; proeth:option2 "Undertake a comprehensive technical review — including traffic volume analysis, accident history data, and a detailed standards compliance audit — before filing any report to state or federal authorities, to ensure the report is fully defensible against challenge and cannot be dismissed as speculative or incomplete" ; proeth:option3 "File an immediate preliminary notice of concern to state authorities identifying the state law prerequisite violation — which is a matter of positive law requiring no additional technical analysis — while deferring the broader engineering standards escalation to federal authorities until a more comprehensive technical review can be completed" ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A Fact Command Before Traffic Safety Reporting" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:51:07.588399"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 112 Extraction" .