City Council Legislative Authority Instance

R · Role Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/112#City_Council_Legislative_Authority_Instance
Definition

The city council voted to proceed with the proposed ordinance change despite objections from the city attorney regarding engineering standards and state law requirements.

Properties
Instance of
CityCouncilLegislativeAuthority
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CityCouncilLegislativeAuthority
Attributes
typeElected municipal legislative body
actionVoted to proceed with ordinance change contrary to engineering standards
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Relationships
typeauthority_over
targetTraffic Engineering Infrastructure
typeinfluenced_by
targetCitizen Advocacy Group Ordinance Promoter Instance
typereceived_advice_from
targetCity Attorney Legal Advisor to Council Instance
Role category
public_responsibility
Source Evidence
Source text
the city council voted to proceed with the proposed change to the ordinance

Text references
brought forth by a city council member
the city council voted to proceed with the proposed change to the ordinance
TTL
@prefix case112: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/112#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case112:City_Council_Legislative_Authority_Instance a proeth:CityCouncilLegislativeAuthority, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "City Council Legislative Authority Instance" ; proeth:attributes "{'type': 'Elected municipal legislative body', 'action': 'Voted to proceed with ordinance change contrary to engineering standards'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "The city council voted to proceed with the proposed ordinance change despite objections from the city attorney regarding engineering standards and state law requirements." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.95" ; proeth:discoveredincase "112" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T22:22:11.564428+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "112" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T22:22:11.564428+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'authority_over', 'target': 'Traffic Engineering Infrastructure'}", "{'type': 'influenced_by', 'target': 'Citizen Advocacy Group Ordinance Promoter Instance'}", "{'type': 'received_advice_from', 'target': 'City Attorney Legal Advisor to Council Instance'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ; proeth:roleclass "City Council Legislative Authority" ; proeth:sourcetext "the city council voted to proceed with the proposed change to the ordinance" ; proeth:textreferences "brought forth by a city council member", "the city council voted to proceed with the proposed change to the ordinance" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 112 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:36:52.842842"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 112 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 23:35
Discovered in case
112
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T22:22:11.564428+00:00
First case
112
Generated
2026-02-27T22:22:11.564428+00:00
Attributed to
Case 112 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:36:52.842842
Generated by
ProEthica Case 112 Extraction