City Council Legislative Authority Instance
Individual
902a6b1a
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/112#City_Council_Legislative_Authority_Instance
Definition
The city council voted to proceed with the proposed ordinance change despite objections from the city attorney regarding engineering standards and state law requirements.
Properties
Parent
CityCouncilLegislativeAuthority
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CityCouncilLegislativeAuthority
Attributes
| type | Elected municipal legislative body |
| action | Voted to proceed with ordinance change contrary to engineering standards |
Concept Category
Role
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | authority_over |
| target | Traffic Engineering Infrastructure |
| type | influenced_by |
| target | Citizen Advocacy Group Ordinance Promoter Instance |
| type | received_advice_from |
| target | City Attorney Legal Advisor to Council Instance |
Role Category
public_responsibility
Role Class
City Council Legislative Authority
Source Evidence
Source Text
the city council voted to proceed with the proposed change to the ordinance
Text References
brought forth by a city council member
the city council voted to proceed with the proposed change to the ordinance
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_112: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/112> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/112#City_Council_Legislative_Authority_Instance> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "City Council Legislative Authority Instance" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CityCouncilLegislativeAuthority> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
902a6b1a4e320f4f...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
112
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-02-27T22:22:11.564428+00:00
First Case
112
Generated
2026-02-27T22:22:11.564428+00:00
Attributed To
Case 112 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:36:52.842842
Generated By
ProEthica Case 112 Extraction