Forensic Expert Non-Advocate Status Violated by XYZ Engineering
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/111#Forensic_Expert_Non-Advocate_Status_Violated_by_XYZ_Engineering
Properties
Instance of
ForensicExpertNon-AdvocateStatusinCivilLitigation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ForensicExpertNon-AdvocateStatusinCivilLitigation
Applied to
Hurricane damage assessment reports
Property insurance company client relationship
Balancing with
Client Loyalty
Concrete expression
XYZ Engineering, through Supervisor B's alteration of Engineer A's sealed reports, transformed Engineer A's objective forensic assessments into advocacy documents for the insurance company's claim-denial position — violating the principle that forensic engineers are not advocates for the retaining party and must not selectively alter findings to serve the client's commercial interests
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Interpretation
The insurance forensic context, while not strictly litigation, involves the same non-advocate obligation: Engineer A's role was to provide objective technical findings about damage causation, not to advocate for the insurer's preferred outcome of claim denial
Invoked by
Supervisor B Report-Altering Non-Engineer Supervisor
XYZ Engineering Firm Employer
Tension resolution
The non-advocate status of forensic engineers is absolute; the insurer's commercial interest in claim denial does not authorize the transformation of objective findings into advocacy through unauthorized alteration
Source Evidence
Source text
Supervisor B, one of the principals of XYZ Engineering and not a professional engineer, reviews the reports and asks Engineer A to make changes to some of the reports to indicate that the residential property damage was not hurricane-related but due to a pre-existing structural condition.
Text references
Supervisor B, one of the principals of XYZ Engineering and not a professional engineer, reviews the reports and asks Engineer A to make changes to some of the reports to indicate that the residential property damage was not hurricane-related but due to a pre-existing structural condition.
There is no supplemental technical or other information to indicate any basis for the apparent alteration of Engineer A's report.
TTL
@prefix case111: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/111#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case111:Forensic_Expert_Non-Advocate_Status_Violated_by_XYZ_Engineering a proeth:ForensicExpertNon-AdvocateStatusinCivilLitigation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Forensic Expert Non-Advocate Status Violated by XYZ Engineering" ;
proeth:appliedto "Hurricane damage assessment reports",
"Property insurance company client relationship" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client Loyalty" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "XYZ Engineering, through Supervisor B's alteration of Engineer A's sealed reports, transformed Engineer A's objective forensic assessments into advocacy documents for the insurance company's claim-denial position — violating the principle that forensic engineers are not advocates for the retaining party and must not selectively alter findings to serve the client's commercial interests" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "111" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T00:09:09.111477+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "111" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T00:09:09.111477+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The insurance forensic context, while not strictly litigation, involves the same non-advocate obligation: Engineer A's role was to provide objective technical findings about damage causation, not to advocate for the insurer's preferred outcome of claim denial" ;
proeth:invokedby "Supervisor B Report-Altering Non-Engineer Supervisor",
"XYZ Engineering Firm Employer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Forensic Expert Non-Advocate Status in Civil Litigation" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Supervisor B, one of the principals of XYZ Engineering and not a professional engineer, reviews the reports and asks Engineer A to make changes to some of the reports to indicate that the residential property damage was not hurricane-related but due to a pre-existing structural condition." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The non-advocate status of forensic engineers is absolute; the insurer's commercial interest in claim denial does not authorize the transformation of objective findings into advocacy through unauthorized alteration" ;
proeth:textreferences "Supervisor B, one of the principals of XYZ Engineering and not a professional engineer, reviews the reports and asks Engineer A to make changes to some of the reports to indicate that the residential property damage was not hurricane-related but due to a pre-existing structural condition.",
"There is no supplemental technical or other information to indicate any basis for the apparent alteration of Engineer A's report." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 111 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T00:24:48.290858"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 111 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
111
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T00:09:09.111477+00:00
First case
111
Generated
2026-02-28T00:09:09.111477+00:00
Attributed to
Case 111 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T00:24:48.290858
Generated by
ProEthica Case 111 Extraction