BER_Case_09-6
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/111#BER_Case_09-6
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.99
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 09-6
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review in analogical reasoning about the present case
Used in context
Cited as precedent establishing that it is unethical for one engineer to make changes to design documents prepared and sealed by another engineer without conferring and gaining that engineer's approval, even under time pressure and even when technically competent to do so
Version
2009
Source Evidence
Source text
More recently, in BER Case 09-6, two professional engineers with similar backgrounds and expertise in electrical engineering were assigned to the same project
Text references
In deciding that it was not ethical for Engineer A to make minor changes to design documents prepared and revised by Engineer B without conferring and gaining the approval of Engineer B
More recently, in BER Case 09-6, two professional engineers with similar backgrounds and expertise in electrical engineering were assigned to the same project
TTL
@prefix case111: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/111#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case111:BER_Case_09-6 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER_Case_09-6" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.99" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "111" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 09-6" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T00:06:22.441407+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "111" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T00:06:22.441407+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "More recently, in BER Case 09-6, two professional engineers with similar backgrounds and expertise in electrical engineering were assigned to the same project" ;
proeth:textreferences "In deciding that it was not ethical for Engineer A to make minor changes to design documents prepared and revised by Engineer B without conferring and gaining the approval of Engineer B",
"More recently, in BER Case 09-6, two professional engineers with similar backgrounds and expertise in electrical engineering were assigned to the same project" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review in analogical reasoning about the present case" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Cited as precedent establishing that it is unethical for one engineer to make changes to design documents prepared and sealed by another engineer without conferring and gaining that engineer's approval, even under time pressure and even when technically competent to do so" ;
proeth:version "2009" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 111 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T00:24:48.301371"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 111 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
111
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T00:06:22.441407+00:00
First case
111
Generated
2026-02-28T00:06:22.441407+00:00
Attributed to
Case 111 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T00:24:48.301371
Generated by
ProEthica Case 111 Extraction