Engineer B Cross-Discipline Out-of-Competence Structural Design Engineer
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#Engineer_B_Cross-Discipline_Out-of-Competence_Structural_Design_Engineer
Definition
Professional engineer with a chemical engineering degree and background, separately retained by the construction contractor to design structural footings for the industrial facility, with no apparent subsequent training in foundation design identified by Engineer A.
Properties
Instance of
Cross-DisciplineOut-of-CompetenceStructuralDesignEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Cross-DisciplineOut-of-CompetenceStructuralDesignEngineer
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer |
| degree_discipline | Chemical Engineering |
| assigned_scope | Structural footing design |
| competence_gap | No apparent subsequent training in foundation design |
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | peer |
| target | Engineer A Competency-Challenging Co-Project Engineer |
| type | retained_by |
| target | Construction Contractor Design-Build Project Retaining Contractor Client |
Role category
provider_client
Relationships
adheresToPrinciple
Employer and Client Pressure Non-Exemption from Competence Boundary Applied to Engineer B, Ethics Code as Higher Standard Than Legal Minimum Applied to Engineer B PE Licensure Defense, Retained-Engineer Sub-Delegation Infeasibility Constraint Applied to Engineer B Structural Footing Sole-Purpose Retention, Universal Competence Scope Limitation Invoked Against Engineer B Structural Footing Assignment, Universal Engineer Competence Scope Limitation Invoked Against Engineer B Chemical-to-Structural Practice
hasObligation
Engineer B Cross-Discipline Structural Footing Assignment Acceptance Refusal Obligation, Engineer B Domain-Specific Competence Verification Before Structural Footing Acceptance Obligation, Engineer B PE License Non-Sufficiency Ethics Code Higher Standard Recognition Obligation, Engineer B Sole-Purpose Structural Footing Sub-Delegation Infeasibility Recognition Obligation
Source Evidence
Source text
the construction contractor separately retains the services of Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings
Text references
Engineer A has been unable to establish that Engineer B has any apparent subsequent training in foundation design
Engineer B's degree and background is in chemical engineering
the construction contractor separately retains the services of Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings
TTL
@prefix case110: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case110:Engineer_B_Cross-Discipline_Out-of-Competence_Structural_Design_Engineer a proeth:Cross-DisciplineOut-of-CompetenceStructuralDesignEngineer,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Cross-Discipline Out-of-Competence Structural Design Engineer" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case110:Employer_and_Client_Pressure_Non-Exemption_from_Competence_Boundary_Applied_to_Engineer_B,
case110:Ethics_Code_as_Higher_Standard_Than_Legal_Minimum_Applied_to_Engineer_B_PE_Licensure_Defense,
case110:Retained-Engineer_Sub-Delegation_Infeasibility_Constraint_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Structural_Footing_Sole-Purpose_Retention,
case110:Universal_Competence_Scope_Limitation_Invoked_Against_Engineer_B_Structural_Footing_Assignment,
case110:Universal_Engineer_Competence_Scope_Limitation_Invoked_Against_Engineer_B_Chemical-to-Structural_Practice ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case110:Engineer_B_Cross-Discipline_Structural_Footing_Assignment_Acceptance_Refusal_Obligation,
case110:Engineer_B_Domain-Specific_Competence_Verification_Before_Structural_Footing_Acceptance_Obligation,
case110:Engineer_B_PE_License_Non-Sufficiency_Ethics_Code_Higher_Standard_Recognition_Obligation,
case110:Engineer_B_Sole-Purpose_Structural_Footing_Sub-Delegation_Infeasibility_Recognition_Obligation ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'degree_discipline': 'Chemical Engineering', 'assigned_scope': 'Structural footing design', 'competence_gap': 'No apparent subsequent training in foundation design'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Professional engineer with a chemical engineering degree and background, separately retained by the construction contractor to design structural footings for the industrial facility, with no apparent subsequent training in foundation design identified by Engineer A." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:09:36.536427+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:09:36.536427+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer A Competency-Challenging Co-Project Engineer'}",
"{'type': 'retained_by', 'target': 'Construction Contractor Design-Build Project Retaining Contractor Client'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Cross-Discipline Out-of-Competence Structural Design Engineer" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the construction contractor separately retains the services of Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has been unable to establish that Engineer B has any apparent subsequent training in foundation design",
"Engineer B's degree and background is in chemical engineering",
"the construction contractor separately retains the services of Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 110 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:30:44.189867"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 110 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
110
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:09:36.536427+00:00
First case
110
Generated
2026-03-01T10:09:36.536427+00:00
Attributed to
Case 110 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:30:44.189867
Generated by
ProEthica Case 110 Extraction