Engineer A Competency-Challenging Co-Project Engineer

@prefix case110: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case110:Engineer_A_Competency-Challenging_Co-Project_Engineer a proeth:Competency-ChallengingCo-ProjectEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Competency-Challenging Co-Project Engineer" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case110:Engineering_Self-Policing_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Reporting_to_Contractor, case110:Incomplete_Situational_Knowledge_Restraint_Balanced_Against_Reporting_Obligation_by_Engineer_A, case110:Peer_Competence_Challenge_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Based_on_Credential_Inspection, case110:Peer_Competence_Challenge_Obligation_Upon_Reasonable_Doubt_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Assessment_of_Engineer_B, case110:Peer_Competence_Confrontation_Before_Authority_Escalation_Sequencing_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Obligations, case110:Project_Withdrawal_as_Ethical_Recourse_Applied_to_Engineer_A_If_Concerns_Unmet, case110:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_in_Structural_Footing_Competence_Context ; proeth-core:hasObligation case110:Engineer_A_Client_and_Authority_Escalation_Upon_Engineer_B_Refusal_Obligation, case110:Engineer_A_Direct_Confrontation_of_Engineer_B_Recommending_Withdrawal_Obligation, case110:Engineer_A_Objective_Credential_Investigation_Before_Peer_Competence_Challenge_Obligation, case110:Engineer_A_Project_Withdrawal_If_Competence_Concerns_Unmet_Obligation ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'specialty': 'Design/build industrial facility engineering', 'action_taken': 'Reported competence concerns to the construction contractor'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Professional engineer working on the design/build industrial facility project who identifies and reports to the contractor his reservations about Engineer B's competence to perform structural footing design given Engineer B's chemical engineering background and lack of demonstrated foundation design training." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.95" ; proeth:discoveredincase "110" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:09:36.536427+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "110" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:09:36.536427+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer B Cross-Discipline Out-of-Competence Structural Design Engineer'}", "{'type': 'reports_to', 'target': 'Construction Contractor Design-Build Project Retaining Contractor Client'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "professional_peer" ; proeth:roleclass "Competency-Challenging Co-Project Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A, a professional engineer works with a construction contractor on a design/build project" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has been unable to establish that Engineer B has any apparent subsequent training in foundation design", "Engineer A has reservations concerning the competence of Engineer B to design the structural footings and reports his concerns to the contractor", "Engineer A, a professional engineer works with a construction contractor on a design/build project" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 110 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:30:44.190716"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 110 Extraction" .