Degree-to-Task Alignment Verification Obligation Implicated in Contractor Retention of Engineer B
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#Degree-to-Task_Alignment_Verification_Obligation_Implicated_in_Contractor_Retention_of_Engineer_B
Properties
Instance of
Degree-to-TaskAlignmentVerificationObligationinRetainedEngineerSelection
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Degree-to-TaskAlignmentVerificationObligationinRetainedEngineerSelection
Applied to
Design/build industrial facility project
Engineer B's retention for structural footing design
Balancing with
Client Autonomy in Engineering Service Provider Selection
Concrete expression
The construction contractor's separate retention of a chemical engineer for structural footing design — without verifying that Engineer B possessed relevant foundation design training — implicates the contractor's obligation to verify disciplinary alignment between the retained engineer's background and the assigned structural task.
Confidence
0.8
Importance
medium
Interpretation
The contractor's retention decision should have included verification that Engineer B's chemical engineering background was supplemented by foundation design training; the absence of such verification contributed to the competence concern that Engineer A subsequently identified.
Invoked by
Construction Contractor
Tension resolution
Contractor autonomy in selecting retained engineers does not override the obligation to verify disciplinary competence for safety-critical structural tasks; the design/build delivery model does not reduce this verification obligation.
Source Evidence
Source text
the construction contractor separately retains the services of a Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings as part of the facility. Engineer B's degree and background is in chemical engineering.
Text references
Engineer B's degree and background is in chemical engineering.
the construction contractor separately retains the services of a Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings as part of the facility.
TTL
@prefix case110: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case110:Degree-to-Task_Alignment_Verification_Obligation_Implicated_in_Contractor_Retention_of_Engineer_B a proeth:Degree-to-TaskAlignmentVerificationObligationinRetainedEngineerSelection,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Degree-to-Task Alignment Verification Obligation Implicated in Contractor Retention of Engineer B" ;
proeth:appliedto "Design/build industrial facility project",
"Engineer B's retention for structural footing design" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client Autonomy in Engineering Service Provider Selection" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "The construction contractor's separate retention of a chemical engineer for structural footing design — without verifying that Engineer B possessed relevant foundation design training — implicates the contractor's obligation to verify disciplinary alignment between the retained engineer's background and the assigned structural task." ;
proeth:confidence "0.8" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:12:52.651583+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:12:52.651583+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:interpretation "The contractor's retention decision should have included verification that Engineer B's chemical engineering background was supplemented by foundation design training; the absence of such verification contributed to the competence concern that Engineer A subsequently identified." ;
proeth:invokedby "Construction Contractor" ;
proeth:principleclass "Degree-to-Task Alignment Verification Obligation in Retained Engineer Selection" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the construction contractor separately retains the services of a Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings as part of the facility. Engineer B's degree and background is in chemical engineering." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Contractor autonomy in selecting retained engineers does not override the obligation to verify disciplinary competence for safety-critical structural tasks; the design/build delivery model does not reduce this verification obligation." ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B's degree and background is in chemical engineering.",
"the construction contractor separately retains the services of a Engineer B, a professional engineer to design structural footings as part of the facility." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 110 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:30:44.196546"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 110 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
110
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:12:52.651583+00:00
First case
110
Generated
2026-03-01T10:12:52.651583+00:00
Attributed to
Case 110 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:30:44.196546
Generated by
ProEthica Case 110 Extraction