DP2
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/11#DP2
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP2
Decision question
Should Principal Engineer R independently verify Firm IBM's analysis before formally acknowledging the stormwater design error, and what proactive disclosure and remediation obligations does R bear toward Developer G, City C, and affected neighboring property owners once the error is confirmed — particularly given that IBM identified third-party contributing factors alongside the design deficiency?
Focus
Principal Engineer R's obligations upon learning that Firm IBM's independent analysis — corroborated by actual post-construction flooding — indicates the BWJ stormwater design produced post-development runoff exceeding pre-development conditions in violation of City C's regulatory requirements
Option1
Independently verify IBM's analysis against original BWJ stormwater calculations, and upon confirmation of error formally acknowledge the design deficiency, proactively disclose findings to Developer G and City C, communicate the full multi-causal picture including third-party contributing factors, convene the BWJ risk management team, and design and implement a corrective stormwater system
Option2
Defer all acknowledgment and communication until internal verification is fully complete, without providing any interim disclosure to City C or affected property owners during the verification period
Option3
Acknowledge the stormwater design error immediately upon receiving IBM's report without conducting independent verification, accepting IBM's findings as dispositive without checking them against original design calculations
Role
Principal Engineer R
TTL
@prefix case11: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/11#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case11:DP2 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP2" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP2" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Principal Engineer R independently verify Firm IBM's analysis before formally acknowledging the stormwater design error, and what proactive disclosure and remediation obligations does R bear toward Developer G, City C, and affected neighboring property owners once the error is confirmed — particularly given that IBM identified third-party contributing factors alongside the design deficiency?" ;
proeth:focus "Principal Engineer R's obligations upon learning that Firm IBM's independent analysis — corroborated by actual post-construction flooding — indicates the BWJ stormwater design produced post-development runoff exceeding pre-development conditions in violation of City C's regulatory requirements" ;
proeth:option1 "Independently verify IBM's analysis against original BWJ stormwater calculations, and upon confirmation of error formally acknowledge the design deficiency, proactively disclose findings to Developer G and City C, communicate the full multi-causal picture including third-party contributing factors, convene the BWJ risk management team, and design and implement a corrective stormwater system" ;
proeth:option2 "Defer all acknowledgment and communication until internal verification is fully complete, without providing any interim disclosure to City C or affected property owners during the verification period" ;
proeth:option3 "Acknowledge the stormwater design error immediately upon receiving IBM's report without conducting independent verification, accepting IBM's findings as dispositive without checking them against original design calculations" ;
proeth:roleLabel "Principal Engineer R" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T21:08:02.623841"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 11 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-24T21:08:02.623841
Generated by
ProEthica Case 11 Extraction