Conflict of Interest Disqualification Standard - City Engineer J

Rs · Resource Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/11#Conflict_of_Interest_Disqualification_Standard_-_City_Engineer_J
Properties
Instance of
ConflictofInterestDisqualificationStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictofInterestDisqualificationStandard
Confidence
0.92
Created by
Professional ethics norms and BER precedent
Document title
Conflict of Interest Disqualification Standard as applied to City Engineer J's prior employment with Firm BWJ
Importance
high
Used by
Board of Ethical Review analyzing City Engineer J's ethical status
Used in context
Applied to evaluate whether City Engineer J's prior employment with Firm BWJ ethically disqualifies J from reviewing and approving design documents submitted by BWJ to City C; the Board concludes that if the transition occurred at least one year prior to the subdivision contract, no disqualifying conflict exists
Source Evidence
Source text
members of the public perceive the City Engineer J's former employment with the BWJ presents a conflict of interest

Text references
The BER will assume Engineer J left Firm BWJ at least a year before the subdivision work was under contract
The Board is asked to decide if City Engineer J is ethically compromised
The first ethical issue has to do with whether City Engineer J can ethically review and approve design documents submitted to the City by the former employer, Firm BWJ
members of the public perceive the City Engineer J's former employment with the BWJ presents a conflict of interest
TTL
@prefix case11: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/11#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case11:Conflict_of_Interest_Disqualification_Standard_-_City_Engineer_J a proeth:ConflictofInterestDisqualificationStandard, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Conflict of Interest Disqualification Standard - City Engineer J" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:createdby "Professional ethics norms and BER precedent" ; proeth:discoveredincase "11" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:documenttitle "Conflict of Interest Disqualification Standard as applied to City Engineer J's prior employment with Firm BWJ" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T20:36:25.842361+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "11" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T20:36:25.842361+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:resourceclass "Conflict of Interest Disqualification Standard" ; proeth:sourcetext "members of the public perceive the City Engineer J's former employment with the BWJ presents a conflict of interest" ; proeth:textreferences "The BER will assume Engineer J left Firm BWJ at least a year before the subdivision work was under contract", "The Board is asked to decide if City Engineer J is ethically compromised", "The first ethical issue has to do with whether City Engineer J can ethically review and approve design documents submitted to the City by the former employer, Firm BWJ", "members of the public perceive the City Engineer J's former employment with the BWJ presents a conflict of interest" ; proeth:usedby "Board of Ethical Review analyzing City Engineer J's ethical status" ; proeth:usedincontext "Applied to evaluate whether City Engineer J's prior employment with Firm BWJ ethically disqualifies J from reviewing and approving design documents submitted by BWJ to City C; the Board concludes that if the transition occurred at least one year prior to the subdivision contract, no disqualifying conflict exists" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 11 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T20:54:41.752348"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 11 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
11
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-24T20:36:25.842361+00:00
First case
11
Generated
2026-02-24T20:36:25.842361+00:00
Attributed to
Case 11 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T20:54:41.752348
Generated by
ProEthica Case 11 Extraction