City C Subdivision Stormwater Regulation - 25-Year Recurrence Interval Standard

Rs · Resource Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/11#City_C_Subdivision_Stormwater_Regulation_-_25-Year_Recurrence_Interval_Standard
Properties
Instance of
StormwaterManagementRegulation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#StormwaterManagementRegulation
Confidence
0.95
Created by
City C municipal regulatory authority
Document title
City C Subdivision Regulations - Stormwater Peak Flow Requirements
Importance
high
Used by
Firm BWJ (design obligation), City Engineer J (compliance review), Firm IBM (independent verification)
Used in context
Establishes the binding performance standard that Firm BWJ's subdivision design was required to satisfy: post-development 25-year recurrence interval peak stormwater flows must not exceed pre-development conditions. IBM's independent review found this standard was not met.
Version
Current at time of subdivision approval
Source Evidence
Source text
City C's subdivision regulations require that post-development 25-year recurrence interval peak stormwater flows must be equal to or less than pre-development conditions

Text references
City C's subdivision regulations require that post-development 25-year recurrence interval peak stormwater flows must be equal to or less than pre-development conditions
Firm IBM found storm runoff flows to be substantially larger for the 25-year, two-hour storm event after the subdivision was completed
TTL
@prefix case11: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/11#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case11:City_C_Subdivision_Stormwater_Regulation_-_25-Year_Recurrence_Interval_Standard a proeth:StormwaterManagementRegulation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "City C Subdivision Stormwater Regulation - 25-Year Recurrence Interval Standard" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ; proeth:confidence "0.95" ; proeth:createdby "City C municipal regulatory authority" ; proeth:discoveredincase "11" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:documenttitle "City C Subdivision Regulations - Stormwater Peak Flow Requirements" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T20:35:16.956825+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "11" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T20:35:16.956825+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:resourceclass "Stormwater Management Regulation" ; proeth:sourcetext "City C's subdivision regulations require that post-development 25-year recurrence interval peak stormwater flows must be equal to or less than pre-development conditions" ; proeth:textreferences "City C's subdivision regulations require that post-development 25-year recurrence interval peak stormwater flows must be equal to or less than pre-development conditions", "Firm IBM found storm runoff flows to be substantially larger for the 25-year, two-hour storm event after the subdivision was completed" ; proeth:usedby "Firm BWJ (design obligation), City Engineer J (compliance review), Firm IBM (independent verification)" ; proeth:usedincontext "Establishes the binding performance standard that Firm BWJ's subdivision design was required to satisfy: post-development 25-year recurrence interval peak stormwater flows must not exceed pre-development conditions. IBM's independent review found this standard was not met." ; proeth:version "Current at time of subdivision approval" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 11 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T20:54:41.748633"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 11 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
11
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-24T20:35:16.956825+00:00
First case
11
Generated
2026-02-24T20:35:16.956825+00:00
Attributed to
Case 11 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T20:54:41.748633
Generated by
ProEthica Case 11 Extraction