Engineer B BER 94-8 Out-of-Competence Structural Designer

R · Role Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#Engineer_B_BER_94-8_Out-of-Competence_Structural_Designer
Definition

A chemical engineer retained by a construction contractor to design structural footings for an industrial facility, a task outside their domain of competence. The Board determined it was unethical for Engineer B to perform this work.

Properties
Instance of
Out-of-CompetenceCertifyingEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Out-of-CompetenceCertifyingEngineer
Attributes
licenseProfessional Engineer
specialtyChemical Engineering
out_of_competence_domainStructural footing design
case_referenceBER Case 94-8
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Relationships
typeclient
targetConstruction Contractor BER 94-8
typepeer
targetEngineer A BER 94-8 Competency Challenger
Role category
employer_relationship
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B, a professional engineer, to design structural footings as part of the facility

Text references
Engineer A had reservations concerning the competence of Engineer B to design the structural footings
Engineer B's degree and background were in chemical engineering
Engineer B, a professional engineer, to design structural footings as part of the facility
it would be unethical for Engineer B to perform the design of the structural footings
TTL
@prefix case109: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case109:Engineer_B_BER_94-8_Out-of-Competence_Structural_Designer a proeth:Out-of-CompetenceCertifyingEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer B BER 94-8 Out-of-Competence Structural Designer" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#Competence_Boundary_—_Engineer_B_Chemical_Engineer_Structural_Footing_Design_BER_94-8> ; proeth-core:hasObligation case109:Consulting_Firm_Competence_Gap_Subconsultant_Engagement_BER_94-8_Instance, case109:Engineer_B_BER_94-8_Structural_Footing_Out-of-Competence_Refusal_Instance ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'specialty': 'Chemical Engineering', 'out_of_competence_domain': 'Structural footing design', 'case_reference': 'BER Case 94-8'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "A chemical engineer retained by a construction contractor to design structural footings for an industrial facility, a task outside their domain of competence. The Board determined it was unethical for Engineer B to perform this work." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:discoveredincase "109" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T07:34:44.655111+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "109" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T07:34:44.655111+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'client', 'target': 'Construction Contractor BER 94-8'}", "{'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer A BER 94-8 Competency Challenger'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "employer_relationship" ; proeth:roleclass "Out-of-Competence Certifying Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B, a professional engineer, to design structural footings as part of the facility" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A had reservations concerning the competence of Engineer B to design the structural footings", "Engineer B's degree and background were in chemical engineering", "Engineer B, a professional engineer, to design structural footings as part of the facility", "it would be unethical for Engineer B to perform the design of the structural footings" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 109 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:59:20.025172"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 109 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 23:35
Discovered in case
109
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T07:34:44.655111+00:00
First case
109
Generated
2026-03-01T07:34:44.655111+00:00
Attributed to
Case 109 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:59:20.025172
Generated by
ProEthica Case 109 Extraction