Engineer A Current Case Military Certification Refuser

@prefix case109: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case109:Engineer_A_Current_Case_Military_Certification_Refuser a proeth:MilitaryInstallationCivilianEngineeringDivisionChief, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Current Case Military Certification Refuser" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case109:Competence_Boundary_Recognition_and_Escalation_Invoked_for_Out-of-Domain_Certification_Request, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#Competence_Boundary_Recognition_—_Engineer_A_Military_Certification_Refusal>, case109:Engineer_Pressure_Resistance_Invoked_Against_Military_Authority_Direction, case109:Institutional_Role_Non-Expansion_of_Competence_Invoked_for_Division_Chief_Assignment, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#Out-of-Competence_Certification_Inherent_Deception_—_Army_Arms_Storage>, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#Professional_Certification_as_Guarantee_—_Army_Compliance_Certification>, case109:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_in_Arms_Storage_Safety_Certification_Context, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/109#Public_Welfare_Paramount_—_Military_Hardware_Safety_Context>, case109:Universal_Engineer_Competence_Scope_Limitation_Invoked_for_Civil_PE_in_Arms_Regulation_Context ; proeth-core:hasObligation case109:Engineer_A_Arms_Storage_Certification_Seal_Affixation_Prohibition, case109:Engineer_A_Arms_Storage_Safety_Public_Welfare_Paramount_Recognition, case109:Engineer_A_Institutional_Role_Non-Expansion_Recognition_Instance, case109:Engineer_A_Institutional_Role_Non-Expansion_of_Competence_Recognition, case109:Engineer_A_Military_Arms_Storage_Certification_Refusal_Competence_Obligation, case109:Engineer_A_Military_Arms_Storage_Certification_Refusal_Obligation_Instance, case109:Engineer_A_Military_Authority_Certification_Direction_Resistance, case109:Engineer_A_Military_Authority_Direction_Resistance_Instance, case109:Engineer_A_Military_Certification_Deception_Prohibition_Instance, case109:Engineer_A_Post-Refusal_Escalation_and_Qualified_Expert_Identification, case109:Engineer_A_Pre-Certification_Domain_Competence_Verification, case109:Engineer_A_Public_Safety_Paramount_Military_Hardware_Safety_Instance, case109:Engineer_A_Regulatory_Domain_Compliance_Certification_Competence_Prerequisite, case109:Engineer_A_Training_Fund_Unavailability_Non-Excuse_Recognition ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'position': 'Building and Grounds Division Chief', 'out_of_competence_domain': 'Military physical security, arms/ammunition/explosives regulations', 'certification_requested': 'Compliance with Army physical security and AAE regulations', 'training_funds_available': False}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "The civilian PE division chief at a military installation who was pressured to certify compliance with detailed Army physical security, arms, ammunition, and explosives regulations entirely outside their engineering competence. The Board found both the practice and the certification would be unethical." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:discoveredincase "109" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T07:34:44.655111+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "109" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T07:34:44.655111+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'employer', 'target': 'Military Authority Certification Requestor'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "employer_relationship" ; proeth:roleclass "Military Installation Civilian Engineering Division Chief" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A may be a very competent engineer, Engineer A is clearly not knowledgeable in this very technical and complicated area" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A may be a very competent engineer, Engineer A is clearly not knowledgeable in this very technical and complicated area", "insufficient funds exist for Engineer A to participate in such programs", "it would not have been ethically proper for Engineer A to 'certify' compliance with the military regulations as requested", "such a statement, if made by Engineer A would be misleading, deceptive and, on that basis, not ethical" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 109 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:59:20.025638"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 109 Extraction" .